WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls

From WormBaseWiki
Revision as of 19:35, 28 July 2016 by Cgrove (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Previous Years

2009 Meetings

2011 Meetings

2012 Meetings

2013 Meetings

2014 Meetings

2015 Meetings


2016 Meetings

January

February

March

April

May

June


July 21, 2016

Yuling leaving in August

  • Will send out announcements to hire a replacement
  • Will take time to get back up to speed
  • Curators should address concerns before he leaves (documentation, SVM stuff, etc.)

AGR curator call

  • Yesterday we (FlyBase, ZFIN, and WormBase) presented paper curation status tracking
  • Chris Mungall will discuss phenopackets next week

Phenotypes

  • Will be good to be able to compare phenotypes across DBs
  • Is there a working list of Phenologs anywhere? See Ed Marcotte's paper
  • Monarch/phenopackets, Chris M talks next week
  • Uberon; phenotype-anatomy associations in WB could be associated with Uberon anatomy terms

GO annotation model

  • Common GAF was an impetus, but were other reasons
  • ACE format couldn't accommodate some aspects of GO annotations
  • Ranjana considering similar model for disease annotations

WBPerson lineage graph

  • Raymond requests that people take a look and send feedback
  • It's not clear right now where this is intended to be displayed

Web Phenote being resurrected

  • We should talk to WebPhenote people to discuss our existing OA features


July 28, 2016

WebPhenote

  • Ranjana willing to test out the newest version of WebPhenote for disease annotations
  • WebPhenote is currently being built for human phenotype curation
  • Dan (developer) could give WB a demo at end of August

Paper curation status tracking for WB ParaSite

  • Juancarlos has cloned and modified the curation status form for ParaSite
  • Some paper have both Caltech species as well as ParaSite species; this creates problems in the tool
  • WB Caltech standard SVMs are run on ParaSite papers as well as 3 data types (RNASeq, Proteomics, ...)
  • How should we track papers separately for Caltech/ParaSite species? Add a "Curated for C. elegans" or similar standard remark?
  • We may need to have separate tables for each datatype for Caltech/ParaSite

Dumping data subsets from OA

  • Karen proposed having functionality in the OA to dump specific data from the OA in a human readable format
  • Data can be dumped as JSON format, but isn't human readable
  • Curators would need to decide on how to dump field types (single ontology, multi ontology, big text, etc.) and work with Juancarlos

AGR curator call