Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (→Noctua/LEGO) |
|||
Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
=== AGR Portal Use Case update === | === AGR Portal Use Case update === | ||
+ | * Use case working group now working on a gene/gene-product comparison page for all genes in an orthology group/PANTHER family or subfamily | ||
+ | * Plan is to display information for genes side-by-side for each data type | ||
+ | * First data types would include gene descriptions, gene ontology annotations, and disease associations | ||
+ | * For GO terms many would like to see the "ribbon" display with GO slim terms or context-specific terms | ||
+ | * Would be good if ribbon content was dynamically generated (rather than a predetermined set of terms), to reflect the nature of genes in an orthology group | ||
+ | * Could be useful to use SObA logic in display | ||
Revision as of 19:10, 29 September 2016
Contents
Previous Years
2016 Meetings
September 1, 2016
Working group discussions
- More clear about issues surrounding orthology sets
- ZFIN has protein curation that may be becoming a bit out of date
Single-cell RNA profiling
- We've been curating some data, but not clear how to display the data
- Some data sets, like tiling arrays, might conclude genes that are expressed in a cell/tissue
- Genes that are detected at convincing levels (present call) in cell/tissue
- Should we display expression data that we do not (or cannot) update differently from other data
- Simply: is a gene in a cell/tissue or not; is it enriched in a cell/tissue or not
- Could capture quantitative assessments; transcripts per million, etc.
- Should we provide an analysis of raw data to users to perform their own comparative analyses
- Bob Goldstein's group prepared software tools in their paper; could we make use of them?
- Big question: how do we handle divergent (expression) data?
- David (Angeles) working on an expression data analysis pipeline
- Single-cell RNA-Seq data: should it be merged with expression pattern data? Ideally, yes
- There's difficulty in reconciling small and large datasets (or different data types)
- Would we want to apply some type of weighting to each type of evidence for a gene-anatomy association, for example
- In general for expression, it would be great to consolidate data to directly connect genes to anatomy/life stage
September 8, 2016
TransgeneOme import (Daniela)
- adding a Community_curator tag or Curator tag in the Expression model to acknowledge the community curators that annotated/will annotate the data.
- for the records- documentation on the import here: http://wiki.wormbase.org/index.php/TransgeneOme_import
- Daniela and Juancarlos worked on parsing large JSON import
- Data is dynamic: people can add images and annotations; will be updated every WormBase release
- Do we want to import the person that created the annotation via the TransgeneOme project?
- Maybe, but should be free text instead of a modeled tag for WBPersons (Raymond)
- It is likely sufficient to point WB users to the TransgeneOme annotation, without explicitly referencing the contributor
Phenotype assay model proposal (Chris)
- Trying to create a model that can accommodate complex genotypes and make querying phenotype experimental data easier
- Want to co-opt an existing, unused model ?Phenotype_assay to encapsulate details of an experiment
- Proposal is to pull several tags from ?RNAi and #Phenotype_info into the ?Phenotype_assay class
- Remaining tags in ?RNAi could be used to hold RNAi mapping information
- Remaining rags in #Phenotype_info can be used to describe the nature of an allele in the context of a phenotype, or nature of phenotype (Ease of scoring)
- Maybe should keep penetrance, quality and EQ annotations in #Phenotype_info so as to provide detail for each phenotype when multiple phenotypes are used
- It is currently difficult to recreate a phenotype annotation made by a curator using the OA, as so much experimental detail is captured exclusively in the hash
September 15, 2016
Strain curation with disease
- People create transgenic strains for modeling human disease
- We currently only curate strains in CGC (where we get our strain list)
- Other strains have been added via direct communication with Mary Ann
- Ranjana would like to capture strains affecting human disease from the literature
- Many strains not available in WormBase
- Is it worth curating these other strains? Yes; one concern that we would be diluting the quality of existing strains
- Big concern is whether or not the strain(s) are available
- (Raymond) Two aspects of strain curation: 1) strains that are available (e.g. from CGC) 2) carrier of genotype to use for other curation (like disease)
- (Raymond) We could just capture genotype as free text
- Would be best to curate the strains, regardless of availability
- Ranjana will send some example papers/strains to Mary Ann and they will discuss
- We could create links from strains in WB to the CGC (or state that people should write directly to the source lab; might be problematic).
WormBase header changes
- Miyuki has been working on new WormBase header; requests feedback
- Available on staging
Tissue enrichment analysis
- Tool is live and ready to use
- Raymond has added a link to the tool on the Tools page
- Raymond will submit a ticket to put on the main Tools dropdown
September 22, 2016
GOC meeting at USC, November 4-6, Noctua Workshop, November 7
- Next GO Consortium meeting is in early November at USC
- The consortium meeting will run from Friday, 11/4 - Sunday, 11/6
- Noctua/LEGO workshop will be on Monday, 11/7 (9am - 3pm)
- Meeting Logistics Page
- We will need to add all WB curators to the attendees table
- Meeting Agenda - in progress
- People interested in going to the consortium meeting or the workshop should register or let Kimberly know
- Kimberly can setup accounts for people to try Noctua trial curation
Display of top community curators
- Sibyl has setup a widget for the homepage and submit data page displaying top 20 community curators
- Chris has compiled numbers from phenotype community annotations
- We want to gather community annotations from other forms as well (historically and from newer forms)
Intellectual Lineage
- Will display on person page
- There exist "unknown" relationships; can we update those to known relationships?
- We can email both parties of each unknown relationship asking about the nature of the relationship
Gene Ontology development
- There may be a need for an additional ontology developer/editor
- There's an accumulation of GitHub tickets requesting new terms/edits
- It's not clear how the ontology will evolve in light of LEGO curation
Tables in PDF
- Some tables have been converted from Excel to PDF
- PDF tables are difficult to parse
- We can/should ask authors for original Excel spreadhseet
Metabolomics efforts
- PIs working on grants to study metabolomics in accumulated mutation lines
- Want to contribute data to WormCyc
- BioCyc doesn't use same standard vocabularies that WormBase does (e.g. ChEBI)
AGR Portal use cases
- Working group had started working on a gene page, but have made a new use case for general search
- The draft use case would describe searching with general text to find matches to genes, diseases, GO terms, and orthology groups
- Next will try to work out a use case for arriving at a gene comparison page, e.g. starting with a human gene
- Would probably be good to break into smaller groups of 2-3 people to independently work on different use cases
- Starting simple is good, even if the added value isn't immediately clear
September 29, 2016
AGR Portal Use Case update
- Use case working group now working on a gene/gene-product comparison page for all genes in an orthology group/PANTHER family or subfamily
- Plan is to display information for genes side-by-side for each data type
- First data types would include gene descriptions, gene ontology annotations, and disease associations
- For GO terms many would like to see the "ribbon" display with GO slim terms or context-specific terms
- Would be good if ribbon content was dynamically generated (rather than a predetermined set of terms), to reflect the nature of genes in an orthology group
- Could be useful to use SObA logic in display
Intellectual lineage display
- Juancarlos working on display of the lineage on WBPerson pages in a widget
- Data will be pulled from ACEDB and used to generate display
- Performing necessary calculations was crashing the machine
- Want to scale the display based on number of connections
Changes to Disease Term OA
- Terms with no C. elegans genes associated, e.g. when a human gene was put into the worm
- Changes incorporate information for strains, genotypes
- There's still a question about how to encapsulate the information from a single annotation
- Need additional rows in OA to capture a drug treatment from a separate paper
- Modeling can be done once more trial curation is done, some AGR modeling decisions to be made
- Could curate and store data in OA for now, holding it until we have an appropriate data model and display pipeline
- Want to capture strain, drug treatment, conditions, etc.
- How do we connect disease-relevant genetic interactions to the disease or disease models?
- Disease group working out cases of ameliorating/exacerbating disease
- Ranjana will email interaction curators when she needs to, in these cases
Noctua/LEGO
- Can we annotate details of experiment in Noctua? It's not clear
- Noctua has predominantly been used in the context of GO annotations
- Kimberly happy to demo Noctua in group meeting or individual Skype session