WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Previous Years

2009 Meetings

2011 Meetings

2012 Meetings

2013 Meetings

2014 Meetings

2015 Meetings

2016 Meetings

2017 Meetings


GoToMeeting link: https://www.gotomeet.me/wormbase1


2018 Meetings

January

February 1, 2018

Automated gene descriptions - orthology

  • Some genes have human orthology mentioned in automated descriptions, even though the orthology call has not been called in DIOPT
  • WormBase uses EnsemblCompara and other methods (not aggregate method like DIOPT)
  • Orthology synchrony is a challenge; WormBase and FlyBase may need to pay special attention to orthology calls and discrepancies
  • DIOPT is purely automated, does not consider other information about orthology evidence
  • We should be clear about how the orthology calls are made

Next upload

  • Unclear of exact date
  • Probably end of March

SimpleMine issue

  • Redundant genes in input list are merged
  • Should SimpleMine provide an option to keep redundancies?
    • Give option up front? Provide submission step to point out redundancies? Ask for choice?
  • We can default to show row-by-row correspondence, and display the number of redundant entries
  • Conclusion: Make an option for users to indicate if they want row-by-row correspondence or a merged list

Cell type expression

  • Waterston paper
  • 40,000 random cells, clusters sequenced individually to a depth of 20,000 reads; ~1000 genes per cell; cluster data; make judgement call as to what cell types they likely are
  • For now, we can do a simple annotation: significantly expressed genes for each cell type
  • Supplemental table S5 for neurons
  • Maybe just ignore the hybrid calls like AQM/PVM, etc.
  • It may be good to isolate the single cell data from other expression data
  • We should annotate/capture the expression clusters
  • Would be good to be able to do enrichment analysis on the clusters; compare data sets
  • Data has not been placed in SPELL yet, Gary considered the data a work in progress
  • We can communicate with Waterston group; are they collecting more data?
  • Wen will take another look at the data
  • Gary W. concerned about the reported/assumed/inferred identity of the cells in the paper
  • Probably cannot curate to individual cells, but we can annotate to a higher level term
  • We want to annotate and display expression enrichment as well as presence/absence calls


February 8, 2018

Release schedule

  • Wen will ask Hinxton to update the published release schedule (for next data upload)

New York Worm Meeting

  • Wen and Kimberly will present a WormBase tutorial on March 24

GO curation

  • New simple input form for Noctua, being developed at USC
  • Not very much GO curation happening at WB right now
  • Protein-2-GO pipeline
  • Do we have a good Phenotype-2-GO(Process) mapping pipeline? We have our old mappings; not very reliable; would need to spend more time expanding the worm phenotype ontology and GO to improve
  • Cellular component curation will come in from WB expression curation
  • Don't have pipeline for Interactions-2-GO
  • Textpresso Molecular Functions pipeline?
  • geneprod and catalyticact data types for molecular function pipeline
  • Textpresso can send molecular function annotations to Noctua
  • For high-level pathway curation; we should probably read WormBook chapters (or other reviews) and develop pathways (using non-experimental evidence codes)
  • We could potentially seed Noctua models from Reactome
  • We would like to have complete curation for major pathways for gene enrichment analysis