Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (→June 8, 2017) |
m (→June 8, 2017) |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
=== IWM swag === | === IWM swag === | ||
− | [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1butQQgD8OvDoly5yWOh2pbUZzoXV3RzGVbCBLemV6hU/edit Google Doc] | + | * [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1butQQgD8OvDoly5yWOh2pbUZzoXV3RzGVbCBLemV6hU/edit Google Doc] |
+ | * We have left over tattoos, fly swatters, bandanas | ||
+ | * Something to identify WormBase staff? | ||
=== ?Phenotype_experiment data model === | === ?Phenotype_experiment data model === |
Revision as of 18:03, 8 June 2017
Contents
Previous Years
2017 Meetings
June 1, 2017
Upload
- After worm meeting, (June 27th)
IWM swag
- Rubber bracelets?
- Left over bandanas? paid ~$1 per bandana before. We have enough for WormBase staff
- Water bottles?
- Small boxes of mints?
- Will need to decide soon to have enough time for ordering
Phenotype modeling
- Chris still working on ?Phenotype_assay (?Phenotype_experiment/?Phenotype_annotation) class model
- May require a new OA that supersedes the Phenotype OA and RNAi OA
- The new model still requires the #Phenotype_info hash as long as we still want to make assertions (e.g. loss-of-function, gain-of-function, recessive, dominant) about specific perturbations (e.g. variations) in the context of the phenotype experiment
- Have tried to pull penetrance info out of the #Phenotype_info hash and into the ?Phenotype_assay model, but this would require only ever having one phenotype (or one set of phenotypes) with penetrance values per experiment
- There are several ?RNAi objects in ACEDB that refer to multiple phenotypes, each with their own remark and penetrance values. Question is whether we want to separate out all the individual phenotype observations into multiple distinct ?RNAi objects and, soon, ?Phenotype_assay objects
- If the only time we want to apply a value like "gain-of-function" or "recessive" to an allele is when a single allele is used, we could get away with keeping those tags in the ?Phenotype_assay model and not use the #Phenotype_info hash
- Chris will share the model proposal and put together some examples for next week's meeting
June 8, 2017
IWM swag
- Google Doc
- We have left over tattoos, fly swatters, bandanas
- Something to identify WormBase staff?