Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 36: Line 36:
 
* User interface: would be good if curators could have a look and review again
 
* User interface: would be good if curators could have a look and review again
 
* Latest GAFs added were for Life Stage and Disease
 
* Latest GAFs added were for Life Stage and Disease
 +
 +
=== GAF vs GPAD/GPI file formats ===
 +
* GO traditionally uses GAF format
 +
* Migrating to GPAD/GPI [Gene Product Annotation Data / Gene Product Information] format
 +
* Backend of Amigo2/WOBr uses OWL-tool
 +
* Kimberly discussing with GO team

Revision as of 16:41, 5 June 2014

Previous Years

2009 Meetings

2011 Meetings

2012 Meetings

2013 Meetings


2014 Meetings

January

February

March

April

May


June 5, 2014

Agenda

  • GAF vs GPAD/GPI file formats
    • GO still uses both, but is moving towards using GPAD/GPI as their preferred format.
    • We will always need GAF for WOBr?
  • LEGO Curation/Noctua Development
    • Tool is still under significant development at Berkeley.
    • What are our plans/goals at Caltech? How best to align this with Berkeley development?

WormBase Ontology Browser (WOBr) for WS244 release

  • User interface: would be good if curators could have a look and review again
  • Latest GAFs added were for Life Stage and Disease

GAF vs GPAD/GPI file formats

  • GO traditionally uses GAF format
  • Migrating to GPAD/GPI [Gene Product Annotation Data / Gene Product Information] format
  • Backend of Amigo2/WOBr uses OWL-tool
  • Kimberly discussing with GO team