Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Replaced content with '2009 Meetings ==2011 Meetings== February')
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_2009|2009 Meetings]]
 
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_2009|2009 Meetings]]
  
==February 10, 2011==
 
  
*Should we have a Caltech project/site manager? We'll look at the issues to be solved first
+
==2011 Meetings==
  
*Todd would like to know more about what's going on at Caltech
+
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_February_2011|February]]
**What would Todd like to know about? New ideas, data types?
 
**What can we communicate more effectively to Todd?
 
 
 
*Should we take minutes of Caltech WormBase group meetings and send around?
 
 
 
*Kimberly: helpful (for off site individuals) if we go around the room to talk about what each of us is working on
 
 
 
*Bitbucket use
 
**How do we see only what pertains to us, individually?
 
**Paul: good way to document bugs and fixes, problems/solutions
 
**Bitbucket Wiki - does that capture what people want/need to see?
 
**Who should Todd follow? What would Todd like to know about?
 
**Raymond: used for code development/versioning by OICR; may be the best use for Bitbucket
 
**Should we develop best practices guideline for Bitbucket use?
 
***Avoid posting topics that are too specific or too vague?
 
***What do we want most to get out of Bitbucket?
 
**Curation efforts? No
 
 
 
*SAB Meeting
 
**Not much feedback for literature curators
 
**User interface stuff took precedence
 
**Paul: Testing, spot-checking website for errors
 
**Web issues, e-mails from Gary and Oliver
 
 
 
*WormBase-wide conference call twice per month
 
**First & third Thursday of the month
 
**Starting next Thursday (2-17) @ 8:30am PST
 
**Web redesign meetings on Thursdays will have to be every other week? Do both same day?
 
 
 
*Raymond: WormBase mirrors
 
**Do we want to implement the Genome Browser for the mirror(s)? If practical
 
**It seems as though Caltech mirror has been crashing often
 
**Has the Caltech mirror been working for people lately? Yes, more or less
 
 
 
 
 
== February 17, 2011 ==
 
 
 
Interaction dumping script
 
*Spot check table
 
*Push changes to Git? Yes, to main branch
 
 
 
 
 
Interactions automatically downloaded to FTP every release? Yes
 
*People should check their own curation data
 
*Users query frequently?
 
*Can WormMart work instead?
 
*Ruihua - feature can be added
 
*Todd - good to have pre-defined queries generated automatically
 
*Parse/remove predicted interactions (400,000) from others during dump? Yes
 
*Paul - Wei Wei wants to help with updates - who should she contact at WB?
 
 
 
 
 
Ranjana - Solar flares causing static on phone? ;)
 
 
 
 
 
Newsletter for new website release? Yes
 
*Todd - 5 development milestones
 
**teleconference with Gary Ruvkun's lab next week
 
**Go live with Beta version in June (@IWM)
 
**Go live live with new site in September
 
**Retire old site at end of year
 
**Need outreach, documentation, screencasts
 
 
 
 
 
BioGRID
 
*WormBase to BioGRID curation
 
*Issues of mapping interaction types: WB -> BioGRID vs. BioGRID -> WB
 
*Moving towards using WB interaction types
 
*Definitions of our interaction types
 
*Rose will propose to BioGRID community
 
*Physical interactions - BioGRID has a better format
 
**break physical interactions away from other interaction types?
 
**Kimberly can propose changes to model: YH separate from other interactions?
 
**Physical vs Genetic interactions? keep separate
 
*We need an interaction ontology, of some sort
 
*Who should Wei Wei contact, how to coordinate with Hinxton; getting data from FlyBase and SGD?
 
**Automation?
 
*Interaction pages - explain what the interaction is based on; provenance/reference
 
*Gene Orienteer shows data, but user has to link out
 
 
 
 
 
WormBase IWM souvenir?
 
*Computer stress ball? with new site address?
 
*bouncy ball?
 
*worm rubber band thing?
 
*Screen shield?
 
*Complementary iPads? ;)
 
*Antifungal socks? wristbands?
 
 
 
 
 
SPELL
 
*new data doesn't load; problem runnning search engine; can load it on athena, not generalizable problem?
 
*OS was not complete with an update; try again
 
*two virtual machines working back and forth for support
 
*how often is SPELL being used? log?; had 6-7 users within two weeks complaining of SPELL problems
 
*Todd - can send Google analytic tool to put at bottom of page
 
*Wen - SPELL testing server; official and mirror; want a separate testing server for new releases; mirror on athena (Wen's working machine); Raymond says don't want to attract users to that machine; WB's running SPELL on altair; heavily loaded and has had problems; relying on athena may be problematic
 
*maybe we need analysis of all of our machines to see big picture; can we consolidate machines; make use of ones we have? If not we can get another machine.
 
*what type of machine do we need?
 
*Log of all machines with purchase date and functionality?
 
*Linux vs Mac curators? athena development machine;
 
*how much power do the scripts need? can check
 
*may not be appropriate as official server if main machine goes down
 
*WB and athena can run SPELL server, but not others. security problems?
 
*prefer work machine is readily re-bootable; reconfigure software easily without affecting other things that people rely on
 
*need 10GB space; 4GB memory? SPELL production server; want it stable for outside world; hardware designed for that purpose; farm it out to IMSS?
 
*complexity of the application; Linux can run multiple applications; caprica has SVM production and WormMart; understand demand of the application; requirements; development vs running scripts, how often? Efficient use of machines. Have 2 computers, getting a third; for WormMart need power; traffic suddenly increased yesterday; monitor traffic; not much personal experience with server maintenance; cluster needs lots of expertise
 
*building official sever of SPELL at OICR? Yes
 
 
 
 
 
WormMart
 
*with WormMart and WormBase, people just want to know if it's down, just to know to lessen frustration; Official statement from dev team
 
*WormMart - we give users testing url; can we just change WormBase link to that testing server?
 
*going to change HTML to update users with most recent information; discuss with Lincoln, 5 datasets on testing server; remaining 3 datasets. if WormMart not working, put a message on main site
 
*it doesn't look good to have a link to a tool linked from a production server; if we don't trust the data we shouldn't put it up.
 
*would like to keep the html page as a testing server; could modify page
 
*if WormMart is working OK but not perfect, that's OK; Comment in the banner
 
*the html page is a useful tool to get feedback from users
 
 
 
 
 
== February 24, 2011 ==
 
 
 
CIT Computer Survey - done
 
 
 
 
 
CD/DVD burner not working (Wen)
 
 
 
 
 
Build Scripts:
 
*run @ OICR
 
*dynamic/static files
 
*problem: no one takes care of them
 
*curators should claim them and take care of them
 
**Gene interaction dump script claimed by Raymond and Xiaodong
 
**256 interaction objects empty (should not be); emptied during build?
 
*Monitor usage with new site
 
*Files (like FASTA, GFF) should be immediately available to users
 
*Page that links to the scripts (FTP)
 
*Need to define what we should have (common datasets)
 
**Example: Table with all genes, RNAi phenotype, genetic phenotype, etc.
 
**How many genes have been knocked out by RNAi?, etc.
 
**Metrics table on each species: #genes, #chromosomes, etc.
 
*Curators think about what data should be available
 
*Modifying existing script is easier than making new one
 
*Gary Williams already generates RNAi-phenotype-gene connections?
 
 
 
 
 
Snehal work half-time at WormBase?
 
*Will interview
 
*UI testing?
 
*Curation? GO? Phenotype?
 
*Start April 15th - 8 months? (Sept.) maybe longer
 
*Focus on particular papers?
 
 
 
 
 
Physical Interaction model
 
*Have been discussing with Rose at BioGRID
 
*Y2H, CoIPs, Pull downs, etc.
 
*Store physical interactions in WB outside of GO curation
 
*Data model
 
**YH model vs Interaction model
 
**Physical interaction tag in current interaction model unused
 
**Generalize YH model -> physical interaction model
 
**Add experiment types
 
**Issue: what do we do with existing physical interaction tag in interaction model?
 
**Split out different interaction types into individual classes?
 
**Separate into physical, genetic, predicted classes? Textpresso?
 
**Create separate classes for each experimental type? (Y2H, CoIP, etc.)
 
**XREF Interaction to Physical interaction, Genetic interaction
 
**Goal is for cleanliness and completeness
 
**How to capture experimental-specific info in curation and database?
 
**Suppress Y2H import from BioGRID?
 
**Keep interaction models as they are?
 
**All curators: Review interaction models to see what they want on the curation end
 

Revision as of 18:14, 3 March 2011

2009 Meetings


2011 Meetings

February