Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
Line 27: Line 27:
 
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_February_2018|February]]
 
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_February_2018|February]]
  
 +
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_March_2018|March]]
  
  
== March 1, 2018 ==
+
== April 5, 2018 ==
  
=== Elsevier paper-linking through Scholix ===
+
=== Topic 1 ===
* Bidirectional linking in place with ScienceDirect, Elsevier
 
** We link to their papers via DOI
 
** They link papers to WB
 
* Scholix
 
** http://www.scholix.org
 
** Scholix becoming a standard platform for linking to DB websites
 
** WB would need to establish Scholix integration?
 
** Daniela to check in with the Alliance to see what the other groups are doing
 
** Would Caltech library need to establish a pipeline or would WB do it?
 
* Would be good to revisit the paper page display for what is referenced in the paper
 
** GO terms are not showing currently
 
** Would be good to assess what else is not showing currently
 
 
 
=== Upstate NY Worm Meeting ===
 
* Confirmation from organizers?
 
* Kimberly and Wen reached out to organizers about WB presentation
 
* 20-30 minute time slot for talk
 
** What are most important topics to bring up?
 
** Ask authors to submit sequence for sequence features, etc.
 
** Micropublications
 
*** Would be good to have answers to common questions about micropublications (how we get reviewers, etc.)
 
** Alliance of Genome Resources
 
** Help Desk/ Online chat service
 
* Organizers want WB to have table at meeting
 
* Meeting in Syracuse
 
 
 
=== Midwest Worm Meeting ===
 
* Organizers asked for $50-$100 sponsorship
 
 
 
We can pay for registration but we are not a company to sponsor events.
 
 
 
=== Metrics ===
 
* How do DBs help research?
 
* How much time do MODs/Alliance etc. databases save researchers?
 
 
 
 
 
== March 8, 2018 ==
 
 
 
=== SimpleMine interactions ===
 
* Wen considering adding interaction data to SimpleMine
 
** Should we add a single column listing interacting genes with types in parentheses
 
** Wouldn't want to add too many columns
 
** Want to indicate, for a query gene, genes for which multiple interaction types have been observed
 
* Once interaction data is in WormMine, we can omit it from SimpleMine
 
* SimpleMine is not too difficult to develop or maintain as long as data models don't change
 
 
 
=== SimpleMine preserving input list ===
 
* Adding functionality to WormMine that preserves original gene list
 
* Some input genes return multiple hits/rows
 
* We need to recognize these entries and deposit extra rows separately
 
 
 
=== Alliance working group project plans ===
 
* Interactions
 
** What are prioritized deliverables?
 
** Predicted (physical) interactions: Interologs, Inter-species extrapolations
 
* (Automated) gene descriptions
 
** Ranjana and Ceri have added content to project plan
 
** Add phenotype data to description for information-poor genes (currently last on priority list)
 
* Disease/phenotypes
 
** Cindy et al. producing project plan documents for disease and phenotype separately
 
 
 
 
 
== March 15, 2018 ==
 
 
 
=== HTTP vs HTTPS ===
 
* Plan to move to https site-wide as a standard
 
* Google site ranking includes metric for https security
 
* All pieces in place on main site; just a few small things at Caltech to resolve
 
* What services are having problems?
 
* Raymond: Don't know the SSL details; has made Caltech machines using SSL layer
 
* Todd: Not needed; should be handled by proxy
 
* Todd needs to just know what are problematic URLs; should all be handled by main URL www.wormbase.org
 
* Ontology Browser broke, Juancarlos went to fix then had problem with https
 
* Todd: haven't setup https for all development sites yet, but will do that
 
* Gene Set Enrichment Tool: redirects to local/Caltech site that serves the page
 
** Todd & Sibyl looking at; one possible solution is to get the recent code on staging and replace it (tool breaks on staging)
 
* Juancarlos, Raymond, Sibyl, and Todd will discuss later (Slack channel?)
 
 
 
=== Disease model annotation class display ===
 
* Ranjana has two GitHub tickets open
 
** https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/6044
 
** https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/6241
 
* Data has gone into ACEDB, but no display is configured yet
 
* Ranjana would like to Skype with Sibyl to explain
 
* Bypass ACEDB altogether? Go right into Datomic? Need to check, but will probably pull into ACEDB and do the conversion to Datomic at the same time?
 
 
 
=== Baltimore Area Worm Meeting ===
 
* Chris presenting tomorrow at the meeting
 
* Will cover data mining tools, new data and displays
 
 
 
=== Alliance ===
 
* Paul S: Work on Alliance plans; important
 
 
 
=== Citace upload ===
 
* Next Tuesday (March 20th) at 10am Pacific
 
 
 
 
 
== March 22, 2018 ==
 
 
 
=== WB grant critique ===
 
* Great comments
 
* Skeptical that community curation will take off (or that it will get all curation done)
 
* Positive reviews of Alliance interactions with WB
 
 
 
=== New York worm meeting ===
 
* Kimberly and Wen will head to local worm meeting to present on WB
 
 
 
=== Human Genetics meeting ===
 
* Meeting in October
 
* Will have Alliance presence there
 
 
 
=== Alliance ===
 
* How important is it to have the MOD?
 
* What is the added value of the Alliance portal?
 
* What are the use cases that can be uniquely handled by the Alliance website/portal? MOD site?
 
* Something to think about; send thoughts and ideas to Paul S.
 
* Parallel development pipelines?
 
** Valerio discussing with AGR developers tomorrow
 
** So far, AGR development has been centralized; may need to allow parallel development for efficiency/efficacy
 
** Example: development of automated gene descriptions
 
** JBrowse and GO Ribbon currently developed independently
 
 
 
=== Person curation ===
 
* Cecilia had looked at how other MODs/groups curate authors/persons? Interact with community?
 
* How can the Alliance do the same (union of all approaches)?
 
* ZFIN has person page
 
 
 
=== Variant graphical viewer ===
 
* As requested by Andy Golden and others
 
* Hope to have a mockup by April
 
* Use synteny viewer/browser? Long evolutionary distances (human-worm) may be tricky
 
 
 
=== Baltimore Area Worm Meeting ===
 
* [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1i_LEZsolKXy1NrEqua0u4apgWHiQbkQhifgtMTbz2H4/edit?usp=sharing| Chris' slides]
 
* Enthusiasm for Micropublications
 
* Enthusiasm for the Alliance of Genome Resources
 
* Questions:
 
** How to download RNASeq data values from gene page?
 
** What does "WS" mean?
 
** WormBase provides protein-coding gene exon expression evidence, what about small, non-coding RNAs?
 
** How are micropublication reviewers selected?
 
*** Authors suggest reviewers; uP team suggest reviewers
 
*** PIs, post-docs and senior grad students (vetted; already have published papers)
 
** Are phenotypes included in Ontology Browser also from genetic interactions? Answer: "No", response: "Good"
 
** Are we going to lose WormBase and functionality?
 
* Comments:
 
** FTP README docs need work, updating
 
** WormMine is not intuitive
 
** It's hard to know what each data mining tool is good/best for
 
*** Would be good to have a simple document that outlines the best uses of each tool
 
*** How would we best provide such a document? Location? Versioning? Micropublication?
 
*** Create a one page PDF to print out and give out at meetings?
 
*** Update blogs (describing nature of updates to each tool)?
 
*** Existing FAQ Wiki?
 
*** Important to have a single place for documentation (to avoid denormalization)
 
* Requests:
 
** Create simple Galaxy import of WB genome sequence
 
** Display prevalence of splice junctions
 
** Add README docs to FTP site (and/or update them)
 
** Separate RNAi and allele based phenotypes
 
*** Probably worth considering; have heard from users before
 
*** Could also provide functionality in Phenotype Graph
 
** Include BioRxiv papers in gene page References widget
 
*** Could provide links to BioRxiv (with relevant search results)?
 
*** Is there a way to link BioRxiv papers to the eventually published paper?
 
*** Are full texts indexed?
 
 
 
 
 
== March 29, 2018 ==
 
 
 
=== Gene Set Enrichment Analysis: duplicate entries ===
 
* Although duplicate genes in an input list are not counted more than once, the output lists the valid gene list that includes duplicates
 
 
 
=== Interactions Venn Diagram ===
 
* Jae generated mockups for displaying a Venn diagram of gene pairs represented by interactions on a gene page
 
* Mockups here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z15GwvLT1dUH9VkYCz-NoQ2oFzi_3ds3/view?usp=sharing
 
 
 
=== GO term and spatiotemporal expression comparison ===
 
* Jae generated mockups for representing a GO term and spatiotemporal expression comparison for interacting gene pairs
 
* The data display would/could use the ribbon-style annotation display
 
* Mockups here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z15GwvLT1dUH9VkYCz-NoQ2oFzi_3ds3/view?usp=sharing
 
 
 
=== GO enrichment analysis for interacting genes ===
 
* Jae generated mockups for displaying the results of GO term enrichment analysis on the list of genes that interact with a focus gene
 
* Mockups here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rwy8iuuaXJgu6TnQrGvvfVOXgA5wvtyt/view?usp=sharing
 
 
 
=== Inclusion of negative GO annotations in Alliance GO ribbon ===
 
* See cpx-1 gene page: http://www.alliancegenome.org/gene/WB:WBGene00022271
 
* In the GO ribbon, the term "nucleus" is highlighted, yet this is only because of two negative annotations coming from mouse and rat
 
* Do we want negative GO annotations included in the display by default? Shouldn't we alert users to this if we are going to do this?
 
* Thoughts?
 
 
 
=== Upstate NY C elegans Meeting ===
 
*Wen and Kimberly presented at the UNYCEM in Syracuse last Saturday (3/24)
 
*Feedback:
 
**WormMine is hard to learn (but performing operations on lists of genes is something people really want/need to do)
 
**Video tutorials would be very helpful, especially for teaching students different WB functionality
 
**Micropublications were well received
 
***People were specifically interested in publishing negative results; maybe make that point even more prominent on the FAQs?
 
**Downloading sequences that include coding and non-coding, it would be really helpful to have visual cues for coding vs non-coding
 
**Should the C. elegans community consider moving towards more mammalian-centric gene names, even if that means changing current gene names?
 
*** Tim Schedl already tries to match C. elegans gene names to human gene names
 
*** Idea would be to re-name existing gene names to be more like human gene names
 
**A better mobile app would be great; people want to look up C. elegans info on their phones and the current view is cumbersome
 
* Denise (organizes neuro topic meeting); suggested that WB present at Neuro meeting
 
** Meeting in Madison, WI June 25-28
 
*Better, more comprehensive README for the ftp site
 
*A one-page summary of tools and their key features would be helpful
 
**This static page could then link out to more detailed videos, tutorials, documentation, etc.
 
 
 
=== Changes to Regulatory Interactions Table ===
 
* April has some ideas for changing the Regulatory Interactions Table so that it can display more information.
 
* https://docs.google.com/document/d/12a50imE7WURuOeU39cqBfYdllW7qHw1tLrKrF2Ev7ZA/edit?ts=5abd285f
 
* Separate tables for each interaction type (regulatory, genetic, physical)
 
* Add columns to tables; for regulatory interactions, add “Regulation level” (eg. transcriptional), Anatomy terms, Life stages, Subcellular localization, evidence type?
 
* Currently, multiple interactions are included in a single row, we could change this to multiple rows of the same color to include more details for each individual interaction.
 
 
 
=== FTP README file ===
 
* Many users request updates to README files on FTP site
 
* Likely to become cumbersome to maintain
 
* Raymond: Maybe we can write a script that can automatically generate a site-map/site-tree to get an overview of the FTP site structure; would it be useful? Yes
 
* Will need to discuss with Todd
 

Revision as of 15:26, 5 April 2018