Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 41: Line 41:
  
  
- consider strains with same public name that have diverged
+
* consider strains with same public name that have diverged
- can use new strain names like "WBPaperStrain001", etc. instead of creating new unique ID attribute
+
* can use new strain names like "WBPaperStrain001", etc. instead of creating new unique ID attribute

Revision as of 17:40, 4 January 2018

Previous Years

2009 Meetings

2011 Meetings

2012 Meetings

2013 Meetings

2014 Meetings

2015 Meetings

2016 Meetings

2017 Meetings


2018 Meetings

January 4, 2018

WS264 Upload

  • Citace upload to Wen, Tuesday January 16th
  • Upload to Hinxton on Jan 19th

Strain data import to AGR for disease

  • Will begin to consider pulling in strains into AGR
  • Will need to think about how genotypes are built and stored at other MODs
  • We should encourage authors to include strain IDs
  • Diseases are annotated to genes, alleles, and strains within WB


Curating phenotypes and diseases to strains or genotypes

  • Should we generate a ?Genotype class to capture genotypes without a known strain name?
  • We could create un-named strain objects, that use a new unique identifier as a primary identifier, that represent the entire genotype of a strain used
  • When curating phenotypes to strains, we will want to specify what is the relevant/relative genotype that is causative/correlted with the disease or phenotype observation



  • consider strains with same public name that have diverged
  • can use new strain names like "WBPaperStrain001", etc. instead of creating new unique ID attribute