Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 49: | Line 49: | ||
=== WB Curator candidate === | === WB Curator candidate === | ||
* April, could join WB for 1-2 years | * April, could join WB for 1-2 years | ||
− | * | + | * Could possibly interview next Thursday |
* Could curate sequence features, enhancers, alleles/mutations? | * Could curate sequence features, enhancers, alleles/mutations? | ||
+ | * Would start in January | ||
=== Author First Pass Form === | === Author First Pass Form === |
Revision as of 17:20, 7 December 2017
Contents
Previous Years
2017 Meetings
December 7th, 2017
Next Citace upload
- Submit files to Wen by Jan 16, 2018
- There shouldn't be model changes (that affect Caltech) for this next upload
- Juancarlos goes on vacation Dec 19th
WB Curator candidate
- April, could join WB for 1-2 years
- Could possibly interview next Thursday
- Could curate sequence features, enhancers, alleles/mutations?
- Would start in January
Author First Pass Form
Overall approach
- AFP form would move from being just a flagging pipeline towards a validation and data entry pipeline
- Also move from free text boxes towards autocompletes, controlled vocabularies
- If this is a validation and a portal for data entry forms, should we display everything we can mine?
- Idea is to eventually create data entry forms for as many data types as possible
- Long term goal would include linking to TPC and evidence sentences for validation
- Data types not curated by WB would need to be re-evaluated: continue to mine but share with other curation groups? no longer mine? new WB objects or pages?
- Periodically review the form and add/remove data types and curation forms as needed
- Would be good to ask authors if they had to omit data from the recently published paper and if they want to micropublish
Questions
- Question for WB curators: Are we missing data types?
- Question for WB curators: Are there data types that we don't curate (e.g. domain analysis) but for which we could share mining information with other groups, e.g. UniProt?
- Question for WB curators: Are there data types we should no longer mine?
- Question for Wen: Does it make sense to include an afp flag for expression cluster?
- Question for Karen: What afp tables are populated from the Genetics/G3 pipeline?