|
|
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
| = 2017 Meetings = | | = 2017 Meetings = |
| | | |
− | == January 5, 2017 ==
| + | [[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_January_2017|January]] |
− | | |
− | === BioCurator meeting ===
| |
− | * Who from WormBase will go?
| |
− | ** Raymond (SObA), Chris (Community curation), Mary Ann, Wen would like to go
| |
− | ** Daniela maybe for micropublication
| |
− | | |
− | === International C. elegans Meeting ===
| |
− | * June 2017
| |
− | * Whether all WB staff go depends on whether we have an all hands meeting before/after
| |
− | * Plenty of things to present; AGR stuff etc.
| |
− | | |
− | === Citace upload ===
| |
− | * Prepare files by 10am on Tuesday, Jan 10
| |
− | | |
− | === LEGO curation ===
| |
− | * Kimberly working on different C. elegans models
| |
− | * Working on several pathways simultaneously
| |
− | * Should be in production soon (this year), fully evidenced
| |
− | * Full benefit may not be apparent until AGR has LEGO fully integrated
| |
− | * Working out how inferred annotations propagate from Noctua/LEGO model to GAF
| |
− | * MGI creating many LEGO models
| |
− | * How are curators, that went to training, using LEGO?
| |
− | * Curation level view may not be amenable to general biologist/user viewing
| |
− | * What is the best existing pathway display? WikiPathways? Protege?
| |
− | * GO people (Seth, Chris M., Suzi etc.) are working on display, but have limited resources for this
| |
− | * Maybe we could work with WikiPathways team?
| |
− | * Pathway studio at RGD? Manually generated
| |
− | * Should WB have a LEGO call? Yes, probably
| |
− | * Curators may need access to Protein2GO for full curation/inference by sequence similarity
| |
− | * How do we/should we resolve parallel pipelines for curating cellular component data (Go versus Expression pattern)?
| |
− | * How do we accommodate specific versus general processes? E.g. specific versus general cell division
| |
− | * We would like a mechanism for a LEGO curator to pull relevant data from GAF
| |
− | * We would like curators to focus on pathway perspective of curation, where authors can submit experimental details with a potential automated or semi-automated mechanism to bridge the gap
| |
− | | |
− | === Expression widget ===
| |
− | * Daniela and Sibyl working on a more compact display of the expression data widget on gene pages
| |
− | * Should we keep subcellular localization in the expression widget? Yes
| |
− | | |
− | === SObA for Gene Ontology ===
| |
− | * Raymond and Juancarlos working on
| |
− | * First for WormBase, eventually want for AGR
| |
− | * For GO data, will have three different roots (for each branch of GO); One DAG for each
| |
− | * Could have phenotype graphs from particular perspective, e.g. via anatomy, via life stage, via GO, etc.
| |
− | * Would be great to have a comparative view mechanism
| |
− | | |
− | == January 12, 2017 ==
| |
− | === Caltech LEGO Call ===
| |
− | *Confirm time: Mondays, 11am PST (2pm EST/7pm GMT)
| |
− | *Start January 23rd
| |
− | *Format?
| |
− | **Start with curation of one paper together?
| |
− | ***Possible paper: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881675 The Intestinal Copper Exporter CUA-1 Is Required for Systemic Copper Homeostasis in Caenorhabditis elegans.]
| |
− | **Curators then select individual topics?
| |
− | | |
− | === Switching website to run off Datomic ===
| |
− | * Juancarlos joining biweekly call on Wednesdays with Adam, Matt, and Sibyl
| |
− | * Juancarlos working on Person page widgets currently
| |
− | ** Intellectual lineage graph will need to be rewritten in Clojure
| |
− | * Web team is working out the file/directory structure to organize widget generation
| |
− | * Is the Datomic database denormalized? To what extent? No, not really
| |
− | ** This affects how we might eventually write into Datomic from our curation database
| |
− | * May be best for Caltech to keep a Postgres curation database in parallel to Datomic (and eventually sync nightly)
| |
− | ** This may also be best with AGR as well
| |
− | | |
− | === Biocuration meeting 2017 ===
| |
− | * Who's going? Ranjana, Chris, Raymond, Mary Ann, Daniela (if she gets a talk)
| |
− | * Ranjana - automated descriptions
| |
− | * Raymond - SObA graph
| |
− | * Chris - Genetic interactions
| |
− | * Mary Ann - Community curation
| |
− | * Daniela - Micropublications
| |
− | | |
− | === Community curation presentation on AGR curator call ===
| |
− | * Chris and Val Wood presented; minutes are here- [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PdmdnTduxidxaljExTbalNA4ReyIRsZZmV6U-5ckXiI/edit AGR minutes]
| |
− | * WB community curation numbers
| |
− | ** 321 papers solicited and community curated (Phenotype OA)
| |
− | ** 417 papers community curated in total (Phenotype OA)
| |
− | ** 313 unique community curators (Phen OA); average 8 annotations per curator
| |
− | ** 64 papers solicited and community curated (RNAi OA)
| |
− | ** 74 papers community curated in total (RNAi OA)
| |
− | ** 61 unique community curators (RNAi OA); average 16 annotations per curator
| |
− | ** 3324 annotations total; 2969 valid and confirmed
| |
− | ** 2111 solicitations gone out; 16% response rate
| |
− | | |
− | Val presented some information on how complete contributors were:
| |
− | *''1990s were getting 10 annotations/paper, in most recent years are now getting 50 annots/paper (years are publication years)''
| |
− | *''Curation quality - users often omit a data type, but for what they do curate, they are generally very accurate, and often request more specific terms''
| |
− | | |
− | Chris suspects ~20% authors are complete in their phenotype curation of their paper.
| |
− | | |
− | === Pulling WB data into LEGO models ===
| |
− | * Phenotype data requires a mapping step to map alleles and RNAi to genes
| |
− | * How might we crowd source or get low cost curators to curate bulk data? Followed by expert curation for LEGO models
| |
− | * May be best for curators to take on specific topics of biology
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | == January 19, 2017 ==
| |
− | | |
− | === SObA graph for Gene Ontology ===
| |
− | * Juancarlos and Raymond asking for feedback on GO SObA graph
| |
− | * Kimberly: Can we create graphs for subsets of annotations (manual vs. automated)?
| |
− | ** Raymond: It's doable as a standalone graph, but may be difficult to make an option embedded within the core display
| |
− | ** May be a way to display IEA annotations separately from non-IEA annotations
| |
− | ** Raymond: Can develop a personal view for Kimberly to visualize manual vs. automated annotations
| |
− | * Three root terms for GO, displayed side-by-side in the same graph; root nodes are different sizes and not necessarily displayed aligned
| |
− | * May be able to force the root nodes to be the same size
| |
− | * May want to show/hide individual roots; doable although unclear how difficult to implement
| |
− | * GO function and component are likely to be smaller networks than process
| |
− | * Pulling data from GAF into Solr
| |
− | * Can this be adopted for the AGR portal? Yes
| |
− | | |
− | === WormBase workshop at 2017 IWM ===
| |
− | * Ranjana organizing
| |
− | * Discuss ideas with Ranjana
| |
− | * Have 1.5 - 2 hours
| |
− | * Will want to discuss micropublications and community annotations
| |
− | * We haven't had mirrors in a long time: discuss Datomic for people who want to query? Yes, brief announcement
| |
− | | |
− | === User Survey ===
| |
− | * We may want user surveys to prepare for grant writing, progress report
| |
− | * Could send out to users by May?
| |
− | * What to focus on: performance, data types, usability
| |
− | * Could have multiple short surveys
| |
− | * What one question would we want answers to help with design decisions?
| |
− | * Do we want (eventually for AGR) a professional surveyor?
| |
− | * Are our services meeting user needs?
| |
− | * We can take a closer look at user logs; see what data, widgets, tools used most frequently (least frequently)
| |
− | * We could create focus groups to get feedback from users on specific topics (30 minute sessions during poster sessions, for example); maybe at booth? during meal time?
| |
− | ** Would want to post a schedule with dedicated locations
| |
− | * Could have WormBase hats, brightly colored ;), to indicate to people that we're WormBase staff
| |
− | | |
− | === Disease data display on AGR portal gene page ===
| |
− | * Working out a way to drill down from a summary view down to detailed table view
| |
− | * Need to make sure it is intuitive and non-jargony for end users
| |
− | * Yvonne Bradford drew up some mockups that represent a ribbon or heatmap display of annotations to disease categories for experimental models, etc.
| |
− | * We do want a SObA graph; could possibly create a SObA graph that represents annotations to a gene AND all of its orthologs
| |
− | | |
− | === First LEGO call ===
| |
− | * This Monday (Jan 23) 11am Pacific
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | == January 26, 2017 ==
| |
− | | |
− | === GO-CC annotations to paper term info in OA ===
| |
− | * Daniela working on with Juancarlos
| |
− | | |
− | === Disease working group ===
| |
− | * Working to finalize the DAF (disease association file)
| |
− | * Having extra meeting tomorrow
| |
− | * Will then hand over DAF format to Kevin Howe (WB Data Quartermaster)
| |
− | * In general, Kevin would prefer AGR files to be generated from the WB build process
| |
− | | |
− | === Expression data working group? ===
| |
− | * Daniela asking about an expression working group
| |
− | * We don't have one currently, but one could be generated, although it may not make it into AGR portal 0.3, 0.6 or 1.0
| |
− | | |
− | === Coherence, Consistency, and Continuity working group ===
| |
− | * Working on a standard for table display in AGR portal
| |
− | * Asking for standard functionality
| |
− | ** Table filtering, by column
| |
− | ** Table sorting, including sort order
| |
− | ** Paginated, choosing number of results per page
| |
− | ** Download options, tab-delimited and other formats
| |
− | ** Link to Intermine, to view, save and manipulate table and lists
| |
− | * Currently WormBase has insufficient means to download some lists of results, for example downloading list of RNAi's that cause a lethal phenotype on the "lethal" phenotype page
| |
− | ** WB points users to FTP site, without specifying a file or how to parse
| |
− | | |
− | === WormMine vs AGR Intermine ===
| |
− | * Is Paulo working on shared/AGR Intermine or just WormMine? We think just WormMine
| |
− | * There was an issue with making orthology calls which may have interfered with integrating worm data into common Intermine
| |