Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
*30-character controlled vocabulary for genes? | *30-character controlled vocabulary for genes? | ||
*Annotate (and then display) based on drug sensitivity, resistance, no effect? Show "potential" drug interactions? | *Annotate (and then display) based on drug sensitivity, resistance, no effect? Show "potential" drug interactions? | ||
| + | *Icons on genes indicating drug interaction, for example | ||
Revision as of 17:35, 6 December 2012
2012 Meetings
December 6, 2012
Concise descriptions
- Concise descriptions tool as a pilot for community annotation
- How can concise descriptions be generated on an automated basis?
- Prioritize with genes with little to no known information
- Focus on genes in other species
- GBrowse-visible description (30 character limit)
- Complex gene information will still be best handled manually
- Brugia malayi good starting point; Pristionchus and C. briggsae
- Ralf Sommer would help generate concise descriptions
- Working with Brugia community already
- Could we select what type of GBrowse description is visible (potential drug targets, molecular function (GO term?), secreted proteases, resistance locus, etc.)? Using radio buttons, for example?
- Use GO annotations in automated fashion?
- Parasitic worm vs. Free-living worm descriptions (host, drugs, species-specific genes, etc.)
- 30-character controlled vocabulary for genes?
- Annotate (and then display) based on drug sensitivity, resistance, no effect? Show "potential" drug interactions?
- Icons on genes indicating drug interaction, for example
