Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
m
Line 78: Line 78:
 
*Interaction model was modeled to be compatible with BioGRID's data
 
*Interaction model was modeled to be compatible with BioGRID's data
 
*Revive curator first pass for physical interactions? To tag papers (in the meantime)
 
*Revive curator first pass for physical interactions? To tag papers (in the meantime)
 +
 +
 +
 +
== October 11, 2012 ==
 +
 +
 +
Molecules
 +
*Changing to WBMolIDs
 +
*OA dumpers need to be modified
 +
 +
 +
GO Meeting
 +
*How to make GO more expressive/inclusive
 +
*How can GO represent more of the biology
 +
*GO Extensions: LEGO
 +
*Deeper annotations can help develop the "big picture"
 +
*Phenotype-2-GO mapping: What is the purpose? How does it work?

Revision as of 18:22, 11 October 2012

2009 Meetings

2011 Meetings


2012 Meetings

January

February

March

April

May

June

July

August

September


October 4, 2012

FlyBase SAB topics

  • Genome Space - can integrate data in different formats
    • Cloud-based data integration
    • File conversion done automatically - no need to write scripts
  • FlyBase talking about joining Genome Space?


Protein-to-GO Tool

  • Ranjana and Kimberly performing data checks for testing
  • If file can get to Rachel and Tony, maybe can discuss this weekend (at GO meeting)


GO Annotator Tool

  • Kimberly looking over
  • James will make a couple slides to introduce tool and provide demo
    • 1-minute demo: can have file in XML/HTML format, can highlight, annotate a sentence, and save annotation as a link
      • Demo: simpler = better
      • Prepare for live feedback and discussion


Curation Status/Statistics Tool

  • How many papers have given data types?
  • How many papers have been curated, how many not?
  • How many objects/connections do we have of a given type?
  • How many objects per paper (average, distribution?)?
  • Estimated number of objects/papers exist vs. how many we have curated?
  • Do we care about types of flagging? Curator first pass, author first pass, etc? Yes
    • All flagging types should be shown; combined and individual statistics would be useful
  • Interactive form vs. static page showing curation/flagging statisitcs
  • Tracking negatives (true vs false)
  • Data types in OA vs not (microarray, Protein-to-GO output)
    • Microarray data - Wen can write script to generate stats for microarray curation
  • Curation stats per paper (Raymond): write comments in a remark field; traceable, transparent, available


Process pages

  • GPML - may be able to automatically map Postgres data to GPML
  • WikiPathways has color, formatting, labels, etc. so we can define types/views of different relationships (should follow standards)
  • AWC-ON/AWC-OFF sample page: only single connection type; can be many different types, as we define it
  • "Too many arrows" editorial?


Physical interaction curation

  • On interaction OA (Tab2) physical interactions; 'Colocalizes', etc.
  • Need to establish our data exchange with BioGRID; get BioGRID data in Postgres/OA (daily cronjob?)
  • Interaction model was modeled to be compatible with BioGRID's data
  • Revive curator first pass for physical interactions? To tag papers (in the meantime)


October 11, 2012

Molecules

  • Changing to WBMolIDs
  • OA dumpers need to be modified


GO Meeting

  • How to make GO more expressive/inclusive
  • How can GO represent more of the biology
  • GO Extensions: LEGO
  • Deeper annotations can help develop the "big picture"
  • Phenotype-2-GO mapping: What is the purpose? How does it work?