Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
Line 28: Line 28:
 
*Like to have rough draft by end of July
 
*Like to have rough draft by end of July
 
*Including things we are doing now that are obvious
 
*Including things we are doing now that are obvious
*31 pages total
+
*30 pages total
 
*10 pages for Caltech, likely
 
*10 pages for Caltech, likely
 
*Focus on: Gene function, transcriptional networks, pathways
 
*Focus on: Gene function, transcriptional networks, pathways
Line 35: Line 35:
 
*Not caught up on RNAi and allele curation by end of this term
 
*Not caught up on RNAi and allele curation by end of this term
 
*Logical extensions to GO (we will discuss next week)
 
*Logical extensions to GO (we will discuss next week)
 +
*How are we going to measure quality? Metrics?
 +
**Coverage?
 +
**Accuracy?
 +
**What is a/the gold standard? These things aren't generally well defined
 +
*Other species
 +
**Automated triage for papers
 +
**Use nematode Textpresso to estimate what's out there?
 +
 +
 +
LEGO (Logical extensions to GO)
 +
*Try to use GO annotations to make more expressive statemetns about gene function, pathways and processes
 +
*Prior to this, curators took gene or gene product to describe subcellular localization, molecular function, and processes the product involved in
 +
*Looking to create much bigger picture of the biolgy
 +
*LEGO annotations: adding info to typical GO annotation, such as regulation targets
 +
**TF has sequence-specific DNA binding activity; now add what the targets are
 +
**If TF in nucleus, what cell types?
 +
**Now we could start to create pathways and describe processes in more detali
 +
*Being done with OWL, web ontology language
 +
*Example, the dauer pathway; do more examples to see where the holes are
 +
*8 examples from C. elegans: involving cell types, signal transduction pathways, etc.
 +
*Build much broader picture of the biology of the worm
 +
*Filling in annotation gaps or inconsistencies
 +
*Start to build annotation models
 +
 +
 +
 +
Wikipathways

Revision as of 18:42, 12 July 2012

2009 Meetings

2011 Meetings


2012 Meetings

January

February

March

April

May

June


July 12, 2012

Grant Renewal

  • Like to have rough draft by end of July
  • Including things we are doing now that are obvious
  • 30 pages total
  • 10 pages for Caltech, likely
  • Focus on: Gene function, transcriptional networks, pathways
  • How much have we curated? What is our rate of curation?
  • What is the backlog? How much left to curate?
  • Not caught up on RNAi and allele curation by end of this term
  • Logical extensions to GO (we will discuss next week)
  • How are we going to measure quality? Metrics?
    • Coverage?
    • Accuracy?
    • What is a/the gold standard? These things aren't generally well defined
  • Other species
    • Automated triage for papers
    • Use nematode Textpresso to estimate what's out there?


LEGO (Logical extensions to GO)

  • Try to use GO annotations to make more expressive statemetns about gene function, pathways and processes
  • Prior to this, curators took gene or gene product to describe subcellular localization, molecular function, and processes the product involved in
  • Looking to create much bigger picture of the biolgy
  • LEGO annotations: adding info to typical GO annotation, such as regulation targets
    • TF has sequence-specific DNA binding activity; now add what the targets are
    • If TF in nucleus, what cell types?
    • Now we could start to create pathways and describe processes in more detali
  • Being done with OWL, web ontology language
  • Example, the dauer pathway; do more examples to see where the holes are
  • 8 examples from C. elegans: involving cell types, signal transduction pathways, etc.
  • Build much broader picture of the biology of the worm
  • Filling in annotation gaps or inconsistencies
  • Start to build annotation models


Wikipathways