Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (→June 7, 2012) |
m |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
*Mapping to genomes will be an issue (e.g. RNAi) | *Mapping to genomes will be an issue (e.g. RNAi) | ||
*We would want an automated curation mechanism in place for non-core species | *We would want an automated curation mechanism in place for non-core species | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == June 14, 2012 == | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Mock Upload | ||
+ | *Everything OK | ||
+ | *Wen will leave files in the same directories, so curators will need to overwrite or replace if you want a new file | ||
+ | *Ghost objects? Allele-phenotype didn't have correct life stages; fixed | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Anatomy terms | ||
+ | *Juancarlos changed obsolete anatomy terms to red text in the Term Info section of the OA | ||
+ | *We will update the anatomy terms somewhat periodically | ||
+ | *Some terms get deprecated; if a term gets deleted, a replacement needs to be found | ||
+ | *Merges can be dealt with more automatically | ||
+ | *Raymond will periodically check for "floating" anatomy terms | ||
+ | *Update went smoothly | ||
+ | *Not many 'obsolete' terms being used | ||
+ | *Many subsumed terms | ||
+ | *Paper-anatomy term associations in Citace Minus; Raymond will take care of them | ||
+ | *Kimberly uses legacy data for anatomy term associations to papers | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Interaction OA | ||
+ | *Interaction summary vs. Remark | ||
+ | *Make Interaction type unique (single ontology field) | ||
+ | *Move the "Phenotype" field to the first TAB | ||
+ | *Error checks | ||
+ | **5 Fatal errors (Interaction does not get dumped) | ||
+ | ***1) There are at least two interactors | ||
+ | ***2) There is a Reference | ||
+ | ***3) The Interactor types are compatible | ||
+ | ***4) There is an Interaction ID | ||
+ | ***5) There is an Interaction type | ||
+ | **1 Non-fatal error (Interaction gets dumped but error is reported in error file on dump) | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Error check - duplicate interactions on multiple rows |
Revision as of 18:28, 14 June 2012
2012 Meetings
June 7, 2012
Midbuild
- Wen needs all .ace files ready to test the midbuild
- Chris will send modified WS232 models.wrm to Wen
- Chris will add all model changes proposed for WS233
- ?Interaction model "Rearrangement" tag needs an XREF and ?Rearrangement model needs an "Interactor" tag
New Interaction OA
- Curators should take a look at the new Interaction OA on the sandbox (mangolassi) and notify Juancarlos, Chris, and/or Xiaodong of any problems
- All interactions, including Yeast-Two-Hybrid and Yeast-One-Hybrid experiments, are in the new OA
Paper pipeline for other species
- Kimberly will update pipeline to include papers from other species
- Papers can go through data tagging pipeline (SVM etc.)
- Images could be captured from cooperating journals
- Are PDFs available?
- ~1600 papers for Brugia malayi, for example
- Mapping to genomes will be an issue (e.g. RNAi)
- We would want an automated curation mechanism in place for non-core species
June 14, 2012
Mock Upload
- Everything OK
- Wen will leave files in the same directories, so curators will need to overwrite or replace if you want a new file
- Ghost objects? Allele-phenotype didn't have correct life stages; fixed
Anatomy terms
- Juancarlos changed obsolete anatomy terms to red text in the Term Info section of the OA
- We will update the anatomy terms somewhat periodically
- Some terms get deprecated; if a term gets deleted, a replacement needs to be found
- Merges can be dealt with more automatically
- Raymond will periodically check for "floating" anatomy terms
- Update went smoothly
- Not many 'obsolete' terms being used
- Many subsumed terms
- Paper-anatomy term associations in Citace Minus; Raymond will take care of them
- Kimberly uses legacy data for anatomy term associations to papers
Interaction OA
- Interaction summary vs. Remark
- Make Interaction type unique (single ontology field)
- Move the "Phenotype" field to the first TAB
- Error checks
- 5 Fatal errors (Interaction does not get dumped)
- 1) There are at least two interactors
- 2) There is a Reference
- 3) The Interactor types are compatible
- 4) There is an Interaction ID
- 5) There is an Interaction type
- 1 Non-fatal error (Interaction gets dumped but error is reported in error file on dump)
- 5 Fatal errors (Interaction does not get dumped)
- Error check - duplicate interactions on multiple rows