Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
m |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
*Include Matt Berriman and Mark Blaxter in conversation on this | *Include Matt Berriman and Mark Blaxter in conversation on this | ||
*Could include species abbreviation as prefix: e.g. Ppa_L1, Cbr_L3, etc. | *Could include species abbreviation as prefix: e.g. Ppa_L1, Cbr_L3, etc. | ||
+ | *How should we provide descriptions for each life stage? | ||
+ | *Two main proposals: | ||
+ | ** 1. General ontology of names: L1, embryo, dauer, adult, etc. | ||
+ | ** 2. Go from most general to most specific | ||
+ | *** e.g. Larval stage -> L1 -> Ppa_L1 | ||
+ | *Maybe make a C. elegans Slim Ontology | ||
+ | *Anyone requesting a new life stage should provide a description | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Adding 3'UTR tag for transgene | ||
+ | *Capture gene name (not necessarily DNA text) | ||
+ | *Ignore unc-54 3'UTR | ||
+ | *Triage by cases that come up for interaction or gene regulation events | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Transgene Names (Is vs Ex) | ||
+ | *WBPaperIDEx vs WBPaperID_Ex (underscore) | ||
+ | *Would be good to have consistent naming scheme | ||
+ | *Juancarlos needs to know if any curator wants/needs a history of the name change | ||
+ | **i.e. keep the original timestamp or create new one | ||
+ | **Will likely not create new timestamp |
Revision as of 16:25, 17 May 2012
2012 Meetings
May 3, 2012
Curator Timestamps
- Determining what data was provided directly by curator vs. what was populated automatically (e.g. mapping scripts)
- Older data provided by curators that are no longer here will be problematic
- We should archive all data-processing scripts in GitHub
- Scripts can be made to create a unique timestamp that identifies that script after the fact
Interaction model change
- Pulling Variation, Transgene, Antibody, and Expr_pattern tags out of the Interactor_info hash and into the main model
- This was originally to be able to capture intragenic interactions
- The problem is the inherent disconnect between an interactor entity (e.g. gene) and these objects
- Making this change would force a post-curation mechanism that ties these entities together for intuitive data display
- Such a linking mechanism may be error prone, faulty, and potentially a headache for the web team
- Is there a better way to handle this type of data?
- Chris will discuss with Todd to see how much of a problem this would pose to the web team
May 17, 2012
Life_stage model
- Include species tag?
- Create an ontology of life stages for different species
- There are differences in nomenclature
- Include Matt Berriman and Mark Blaxter in conversation on this
- Could include species abbreviation as prefix: e.g. Ppa_L1, Cbr_L3, etc.
- How should we provide descriptions for each life stage?
- Two main proposals:
- 1. General ontology of names: L1, embryo, dauer, adult, etc.
- 2. Go from most general to most specific
- e.g. Larval stage -> L1 -> Ppa_L1
- Maybe make a C. elegans Slim Ontology
- Anyone requesting a new life stage should provide a description
Adding 3'UTR tag for transgene
- Capture gene name (not necessarily DNA text)
- Ignore unc-54 3'UTR
- Triage by cases that come up for interaction or gene regulation events
Transgene Names (Is vs Ex)
- WBPaperIDEx vs WBPaperID_Ex (underscore)
- Would be good to have consistent naming scheme
- Juancarlos needs to know if any curator wants/needs a history of the name change
- i.e. keep the original timestamp or create new one
- Will likely not create new timestamp