Difference between revisions of "WBConfCall 2016.09.01-Agenda and Minutes"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
 
* Should we put the next build (WS256) on hold? Probably not. OICR won't need to start the working on WS256 for ~4 weeks
 
* Should we put the next build (WS256) on hold? Probably not. OICR won't need to start the working on WS256 for ~4 weeks
 
* Sibyl could possibly attempt to stage WS256, Juancarlos could provide assistance
 
* Sibyl could possibly attempt to stage WS256, Juancarlos could provide assistance
 +
 +
== Working Groups ==
 +
 +
=== Use Cases ===
 +
 +
=== Disease/Phenotype ===
 +
* 2 meetings so far
 +
* What objects do people curate to?
 +
* What are the ontologies and controlled vocabularies that are used?
 +
* There's a mixed bag; group will work on defining standards that everyone can use
 +
* The Disease Ontology (DO) was decided to be a central ontology to use; some funding for DO in question
 +
* Mouse group has been working heavily with DO and OMIM
 +
* OMIM have their own curators and annotation style, not quite ready for receiving input from outside databases/groups
 +
* Discussing curation of NOTs; when a disease model might be expected, capture when it doesn't turn out to be

Revision as of 16:04, 1 September 2016

Agenda

Standing items

Updates from AGR working groups

  • Use-case
  • Disease / Phenotype
  • Orthology
  • Tools

Help Desk tickets requiring attention

Minutes

Todd

  • Was in a car accident; will need to minimize work load and screen time (emergencies only for now)
  • Should we put the next build (WS256) on hold? Probably not. OICR won't need to start the working on WS256 for ~4 weeks
  • Sibyl could possibly attempt to stage WS256, Juancarlos could provide assistance

Working Groups

Use Cases

Disease/Phenotype

  • 2 meetings so far
  • What objects do people curate to?
  • What are the ontologies and controlled vocabularies that are used?
  • There's a mixed bag; group will work on defining standards that everyone can use
  • The Disease Ontology (DO) was decided to be a central ontology to use; some funding for DO in question
  • Mouse group has been working heavily with DO and OMIM
  • OMIM have their own curators and annotation style, not quite ready for receiving input from outside databases/groups
  • Discussing curation of NOTs; when a disease model might be expected, capture when it doesn't turn out to be
Retrieved from "https://wiki.wormbase.org/index.php?title=WBConfCall_2016.09.01-Agenda_and_Minutes&oldid=29595"