Difference between revisions of "WB:Gene:uaf-1"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (follow up experiment to Tom Blumental's article in the Worm Breeder's Gazzette) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Due to the fact that the C.remanei and C.brenneri genome is now available, I aligned them using PECAN and could not find the 2 introns in the other species. Therefore I propose that the form without the 2 introns is the ancestral one. | Due to the fact that the C.remanei and C.brenneri genome is now available, I aligned them using PECAN and could not find the 2 introns in the other species. Therefore I propose that the form without the 2 introns is the ancestral one. | ||
− | Supporting Evidence: [http:// | + | Supporting Evidence: [http://www.sanger.ac.uk/cgi-bin/Projects/C_elegans/compara/mlagan_live.pl?geneid=Y92C3B.2&add=10 PECAN alignment] |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Curation]] |
Latest revision as of 18:48, 17 August 2010
Follow-up to: The C. elegans uaf-1 gene is very different from its C. briggsae ortholog
In a Worm Breeder's Gazette 16:21 article Tom Blumenthal described in 2000 that the C.briggsae ortholog Cbr-uaf-1 is missing 2 introns and that the ancestral form is unknown.
Due to the fact that the C.remanei and C.brenneri genome is now available, I aligned them using PECAN and could not find the 2 introns in the other species. Therefore I propose that the form without the 2 introns is the ancestral one.
Supporting Evidence: PECAN alignment