Talk:WBConfCall 2014.07.17-Agenda and Minutes
From WormBaseWiki
nurf-1 naming
I am still for the b.) option of two cgc_names and two gene, as:
- it has been done like that in other species
- they are out-paralogs so the .1 and .2 nomenclature can apply
- the amount of pain that are caused by shared geneIds is not worth it
Use of Evidence Hash
- Breakdown of Evidence Hash Use
- Not Used?
- GO_term_evidence
- Laboratory_evidence
- Sequence_evidence
- Used Rarely (for concise descriptions, could be retired if all can be covered by Paper_evidence)
- Author_evidence (note Juancarlos' comment about creating WBPerson objects)
- Expr_pattern_evidence
- Micorarray_results_evidence
- RNAi_evidence
- Used, but perhaps differently?
- Curator_confirmed
- Person_evidence
- Routinely used
- Paper_evidence
- Published_as
- Accession_evidence
- Protein_id_evidence
- Variation_evidence (for GO, would be retired with new model)
- Mass_spec_evidence
- Feature_evidence
- From_analysis
- CGC_data_submission (legacy, no corresponding object)
- Inferred_automatically
- Date_last_updated
- Not Used?