Difference between revisions of "Talk:WBConfCall 2014.07.17-Agenda and Minutes"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 21: | Line 21: | ||
***RNAi_evidence | ***RNAi_evidence | ||
**Used, but perhaps differently or inconsistently? | **Used, but perhaps differently or inconsistently? | ||
− | ***Curator_confirmed | + | ***Curator_confirmed (useful internally, but needed on the website?) |
***Person_evidence | ***Person_evidence | ||
**Routinely used | **Routinely used |
Revision as of 14:55, 17 July 2014
nurf-1 naming
I am still for the b.) option of two cgc_names and two gene, as:
- it has been done like that in other species
- they are out-paralogs so the .1 and .2 nomenclature can apply
- the amount of pain that are caused by shared geneIds is not worth it
Use of Evidence Hash
- Breakdown of Evidence Hash Use
- Not Used?
- GO_term_evidence
- Laboratory_evidence
- Remark
- Sequence_evidence
- Used Rarely (for concise descriptions, could be retired if all can be covered by Paper_evidence)
- Author_evidence (note Juancarlos' comment about creating WBPerson objects)
- Expr_pattern_evidence
- Micorarray_results_evidence
- RNAi_evidence
- Used, but perhaps differently or inconsistently?
- Curator_confirmed (useful internally, but needed on the website?)
- Person_evidence
- Routinely used
- Accession_evidence
- CGC_data_submission (legacy, no corresponding object)
- Date_last_updated
- Feature_evidence
- From_analysis
- Inferred_automatically
- Mass_spec_evidence
- Paper_evidence
- Protein_id_evidence
- Published_as
- Variation_evidence (for GO, would be retired with new model)
- Not Used?