Difference between revisions of "Talk:WBConfCall 2014.07.17-Agenda and Minutes"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
 
***Author_evidence (note Juancarlos' comment about creating WBPerson objects)
 
***Author_evidence (note Juancarlos' comment about creating WBPerson objects)
 
***Expr_pattern_evidence
 
***Expr_pattern_evidence
***Micorarray_evidence
+
***Micorarray_results_evidence
 
***RNAi_evidence
 
***RNAi_evidence
 
**Used, but perhaps differently?
 
**Used, but perhaps differently?
Line 30: Line 30:
 
***Mass_spec_evidence
 
***Mass_spec_evidence
 
***From_analysis
 
***From_analysis
 +
***CGC_data_submission (legacy)

Revision as of 14:29, 17 July 2014

nurf-1 naming

I am still for the b.) option of two cgc_names and two gene, as:

  • it has been done like that in other species
  • they are out-paralogs so the .1 and .2 nomenclature can apply
  • the amount of pain that are caused by shared geneIds is not worth it

Mh6 (talk)

Use of Evidence Hash

  • Breakdown of Evidence Hash Use
    • Not Used?
      • GO_term_evidence
      • Laboratory_evidence
      • Sequence_evidence
    • Used Rarely (for concise descriptions, could be retired if all can be covered by Paper_evidence)
      • Author_evidence (note Juancarlos' comment about creating WBPerson objects)
      • Expr_pattern_evidence
      • Micorarray_results_evidence
      • RNAi_evidence
    • Used, but perhaps differently?
      • Curator_confirmed
      • Person_evidence
    • Routinely used
      • Paper_evidence
      • Published_as
      • Accession_evidence
      • Protein_id_evidence
      • Variation_evidence (for GO, would be retired with new model)
      • Mass_spec_evidence
      • From_analysis
      • CGC_data_submission (legacy)