Difference between revisions of "Talk:WBConfCall 2014.07.17-Agenda and Minutes"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
***Laboratory_evidence | ***Laboratory_evidence | ||
***Sequence_evidence | ***Sequence_evidence | ||
| − | **Used Rarely (could be retired if all can be covered by Paper_evidence) | + | **Used Rarely (for concise descriptions, could be retired if all can be covered by Paper_evidence) |
| + | ***Author_evidence (note Juancarlos' comment about creating WBPerson objects) | ||
***Expr_pattern_evidence | ***Expr_pattern_evidence | ||
***Micorarray_evidence | ***Micorarray_evidence | ||
***RNAi_evidence | ***RNAi_evidence | ||
| + | **Used, but perhaps differently? | ||
| + | ***Curator_confirmed | ||
| + | ***Person_evidence | ||
| + | **Routinely used | ||
| + | ***Paper_evidence | ||
| + | ***Published_as | ||
| + | ***Accession_evidence | ||
| + | ***Protein_id_evidence | ||
| + | ***Variation_evidence (for GO, would be retired with new model) | ||
| + | ***Mass_spec_evidence | ||
Revision as of 14:20, 17 July 2014
nurf-1 naming
I am still for the b.) option of two cgc_names and two gene, as:
- it has been done like that in other species
- they are out-paralogs so the .1 and .2 nomenclature can apply
- the amount of pain that are caused by shared geneIds is not worth it
Use of Evidence Hash
- Breakdown of Evidence Hash Use
- Not Used?
- GO_term_evidence
- Laboratory_evidence
- Sequence_evidence
- Used Rarely (for concise descriptions, could be retired if all can be covered by Paper_evidence)
- Author_evidence (note Juancarlos' comment about creating WBPerson objects)
- Expr_pattern_evidence
- Micorarray_evidence
- RNAi_evidence
- Used, but perhaps differently?
- Curator_confirmed
- Person_evidence
- Routinely used
- Paper_evidence
- Published_as
- Accession_evidence
- Protein_id_evidence
- Variation_evidence (for GO, would be retired with new model)
- Mass_spec_evidence
- Not Used?
