Difference between revisions of "Abstracts"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(19 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
{| border="1"
 
{| border="1"
 
|-
 
|-
 +
! Number
 
! WBPaper ID
 
! WBPaper ID
 
! Genes associated via abstract
 
! Genes associated via abstract
! Genes associated via curator
+
! Genes associated via curator (done or in theory)
 
! Percentage overlap
 
! Percentage overlap
 
|-
 
|-
 +
! 1
 
! 00032891
 
! 00032891
 
! cnc-2, dbl-1
 
! cnc-2, dbl-1
 
!  cnc-1, cnc-2, cnc-3, cnc-4, cnc-5, daf-3, daf-4, dbl-1, lon-2, mpk-1, pmk-1, sma-2, sma-3, sma-4, sma-6, sma-9, tir-1, tol-1, cnc-11
 
!  cnc-1, cnc-2, cnc-3, cnc-4, cnc-5, daf-3, daf-4, dbl-1, lon-2, mpk-1, pmk-1, sma-2, sma-3, sma-4, sma-6, sma-9, tir-1, tol-1, cnc-11
 
! 10.5%
 
! 10.5%
 +
|-
 +
! 2
 +
! 00032488
 +
! none
 +
! 50+ (mostly in two different Figures, only ~15-20% mentioned in the text)
 +
! 0%
 +
|-
 +
! 3
 +
! 00032489
 +
! ain-1, ain-2, let-7, lin-4
 +
! cog-1, daf-12, hbl-1, let-7, lin-4, lin-14, lin-28, lin-41, ain-2, ain-1
 +
! 40%
 +
|-
 +
! 4
 +
! 00032508
 +
! none
 +
! maybe myo-2 as a marker for their assay
 +
! 0%
 +
|-
 +
! 5
 +
! 00032509
 +
! lgg-1, sepa-1
 +
!
 +
!
 +
|-
 +
! 6
 +
! 00032506
 +
! unc-5, unc-6, unc-40, unc-129
 +
!
 +
!
 +
|-
 +
! 7
 +
! 00034710
 +
! 0
 +
!
 +
!
 +
|-
 +
! 8
 +
! 00035402
 +
! lin-42
 +
!
 +
!
 +
|-
 +
! 9
 +
! 00031936
 +
! cnb-1, npr-1, tax-2, tax-4, tax-6
 +
!
 +
!
 +
|-
 +
! 10
 +
! 00030829 (tons of supplemental files)
 +
! che-1
 +
!
 +
!
 +
|-
 +
! 11
 +
! 00030846
 +
! 0
 +
! aha-1, cky-1
 +
! 0%
 +
|-
 +
! 12
 +
! 00035489
 +
! eat-16, egl-10
 +
! eat-16, egl-10, WBGene00011531 (rsbp-1)
 +
!
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
 +
Back to [[Associating genes with papers]]
  
 
Back to [[Paper Pipeline]]
 
Back to [[Paper Pipeline]]
 +
 +
 +
 +
[[Category:Curation]]

Latest revision as of 19:20, 10 August 2010

Currently, genes or proteins mentioned in the abstracts get associated with papers. (This was not always the case.)

Are abstracts enough? Here's the data:

Number WBPaper ID Genes associated via abstract Genes associated via curator (done or in theory) Percentage overlap
1 00032891 cnc-2, dbl-1 cnc-1, cnc-2, cnc-3, cnc-4, cnc-5, daf-3, daf-4, dbl-1, lon-2, mpk-1, pmk-1, sma-2, sma-3, sma-4, sma-6, sma-9, tir-1, tol-1, cnc-11 10.5%
2 00032488 none 50+ (mostly in two different Figures, only ~15-20% mentioned in the text) 0%
3 00032489 ain-1, ain-2, let-7, lin-4 cog-1, daf-12, hbl-1, let-7, lin-4, lin-14, lin-28, lin-41, ain-2, ain-1 40%
4 00032508 none maybe myo-2 as a marker for their assay 0%
5 00032509 lgg-1, sepa-1
6 00032506 unc-5, unc-6, unc-40, unc-129
7 00034710 0
8 00035402 lin-42
9 00031936 cnb-1, npr-1, tax-2, tax-4, tax-6
10 00030829 (tons of supplemental files) che-1
11 00030846 0 aha-1, cky-1 0%
12 00035489 eat-16, egl-10 eat-16, egl-10, WBGene00011531 (rsbp-1)


Back to Associating genes with papers

Back to Paper Pipeline