Difference between revisions of "Abstracts"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
! | ! | ||
! | ! | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! 11 | ||
+ | ! 00030846 | ||
+ | ! 0 | ||
+ | ! aha-1, cky-1 | ||
+ | ! 0% | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! 12 | ||
+ | ! 00035489 | ||
+ | ! eat-16, egl-10 | ||
+ | ! eat-16, egl-10, WBGene00011531 (rsbp-1) | ||
+ | ! | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 77: | Line 89: | ||
Back to [[Paper Pipeline]] | Back to [[Paper Pipeline]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Curation]] |
Latest revision as of 19:20, 10 August 2010
Currently, genes or proteins mentioned in the abstracts get associated with papers. (This was not always the case.)
Are abstracts enough? Here's the data:
Number | WBPaper ID | Genes associated via abstract | Genes associated via curator (done or in theory) | Percentage overlap |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 00032891 | cnc-2, dbl-1 | cnc-1, cnc-2, cnc-3, cnc-4, cnc-5, daf-3, daf-4, dbl-1, lon-2, mpk-1, pmk-1, sma-2, sma-3, sma-4, sma-6, sma-9, tir-1, tol-1, cnc-11 | 10.5% |
2 | 00032488 | none | 50+ (mostly in two different Figures, only ~15-20% mentioned in the text) | 0% |
3 | 00032489 | ain-1, ain-2, let-7, lin-4 | cog-1, daf-12, hbl-1, let-7, lin-4, lin-14, lin-28, lin-41, ain-2, ain-1 | 40% |
4 | 00032508 | none | maybe myo-2 as a marker for their assay | 0% |
5 | 00032509 | lgg-1, sepa-1 | ||
6 | 00032506 | unc-5, unc-6, unc-40, unc-129 | ||
7 | 00034710 | 0 | ||
8 | 00035402 | lin-42 | ||
9 | 00031936 | cnb-1, npr-1, tax-2, tax-4, tax-6 | ||
10 | 00030829 (tons of supplemental files) | che-1 | ||
11 | 00030846 | 0 | aha-1, cky-1 | 0% |
12 | 00035489 | eat-16, egl-10 | eat-16, egl-10, WBGene00011531 (rsbp-1) |
Back to Associating genes with papers
Back to Paper Pipeline