Difference between revisions of "WBConfCall 2015.03.19-Agenda and Minutes"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 13: Line 13:
 
== Pre-meetings ==
 
== Pre-meetings ==
 
Sibyl, Todd will come early
 
Sibyl, Todd will come early
 +
 
Xiaodong, Kimberly, Mary Ann will come early, too
 
Xiaodong, Kimberly, Mary Ann will come early, too
 +
 
No official site-wide meeting; can have conversations during UCLA meeting
 
No official site-wide meeting; can have conversations during UCLA meeting
  
Line 21: Line 23:
 
== WB workshops ==
 
== WB workshops ==
 
Chris sent to Gillian Stanfield
 
Chris sent to Gillian Stanfield
 +
 
Sent summary around in email
 
Sent summary around in email
 +
 
We have 90 minutes
 
We have 90 minutes
 +
 
Seven talks - 12-15 minutes each
 
Seven talks - 12-15 minutes each
 +
 
Ask Chris if you need schedule again
 
Ask Chris if you need schedule again
 +
 
Schedule will appear in meeting agenda?  yes
 
Schedule will appear in meeting agenda?  yes
  
 
== WB table - poster sessions ==
 
== WB table - poster sessions ==
 
One booth for WB, one for ParaSite?
 
One booth for WB, one for ParaSite?
 +
 
Try for two - can use both for both projects
 
Try for two - can use both for both projects
 +
 
Chris can email Gillian Stanfield, cc Kevin
 
Chris can email Gillian Stanfield, cc Kevin
 +
 
Any WB posters?
 
Any WB posters?
 +
 
If you want to make one, go for it
 
If you want to make one, go for it
 +
 
Community Annotation poster (Mary Ann, Karen, Ranjana, Daniela) and presence at booth good
 
Community Annotation poster (Mary Ann, Karen, Ranjana, Daniela) and presence at booth good
 +
 
Can make a brief comment in abstract about exploring micropublications - err on conservative side for the abstract
 
Can make a brief comment in abstract about exploring micropublications - err on conservative side for the abstract
  
 
== Help Desk ==
 
== Help Desk ==
 
RNAseq titles
 
RNAseq titles
 +
 
Move from identifiers to human readable descriptions (50 characters - several lines)
 
Move from identifiers to human readable descriptions (50 characters - several lines)
 +
 
Gary Williams will work on this
 
Gary Williams will work on this
  
 
== Slack ==
 
== Slack ==
 
What are people’s thoughts?
 
What are people’s thoughts?
 +
 
Slack features:
 
Slack features:
 +
 
Can create channel for specific topics
 
Can create channel for specific topics
 +
 
Doesn’t copy all previous correspondence with each reply
 
Doesn’t copy all previous correspondence with each reply
 +
 
Transparency in that everyone can see all channels
 
Transparency in that everyone can see all channels
 +
 
Karen - good for tracking emails, threads, can integrate other tools like github
 
Karen - good for tracking emails, threads, can integrate other tools like github
 +
 
Michael P. - doesn’t improve the number of incoming communications
 
Michael P. - doesn’t improve the number of incoming communications
Slack implementation still needs improvement especially wrt threading
+
 
 +
Slack implementation still needs improvement especially wrt threading
 +
 
 
Can anyone give a definitive answer to why we’re changing?  What’s the need?
 
Can anyone give a definitive answer to why we’re changing?  What’s the need?
 +
 
The idea is that this would replace email
 
The idea is that this would replace email
 +
 
What effect would this have on help desk?
 
What effect would this have on help desk?
 +
 
Paul D. - we need to choose and use Slack for the right purposes
 
Paul D. - we need to choose and use Slack for the right purposes
 +
 
Mary Ann - which bit of WB communication is Slack trying to improve?
 
Mary Ann - which bit of WB communication is Slack trying to improve?
 +
 
Chris - intended to consolidate different threads, pipelines into one place
 
Chris - intended to consolidate different threads, pipelines into one place
 +
 
Mary Ann - would external users need to use Slack as well for help?
 
Mary Ann - would external users need to use Slack as well for help?
 +
 
Raymond - can you know if other people have read the message?
 
Raymond - can you know if other people have read the message?
 +
 
Kevin - no
 
Kevin - no
 +
 
Other possibility - LINE (Raymond) - could check to see if someone read it
 
Other possibility - LINE (Raymond) - could check to see if someone read it
 +
 
Would this discourage people from using it?
 
Would this discourage people from using it?
 +
 
Kevin - SLACK really encourages stream of consciousness writing; this doesn’t happen so much
 
Kevin - SLACK really encourages stream of consciousness writing; this doesn’t happen so much
 +
 
when composing emails; important information can get lost in the chit chat
 
when composing emails; important information can get lost in the chit chat
 +
 
Using SLACK for the important exchange of technical information may not be the right medium
 
Using SLACK for the important exchange of technical information may not be the right medium
 +
 
Mary Ann - should we try to improve how we use our existing tools, e.g. wiki?
 
Mary Ann - should we try to improve how we use our existing tools, e.g. wiki?
 +
 
We need Todd to weigh in more here
 
We need Todd to weigh in more here
 +
 
Someone should check with Richard Durbin’s group to see how they like it
 
Someone should check with Richard Durbin’s group to see how they like it
 +
 
Final decision pending…..
 
Final decision pending…..
  

Latest revision as of 16:23, 19 March 2015

Agenda

International Meeting - June

Plans for pre-meeting at Caltech

WB Talks

WB Workshops

WB Table - Poster Sessions

Help Desk Tickets

Asked for more information from user, no response yet: #3690, #3689

Suggestion on titles used for RNAseq display - see #3688

Minutes

Pre-meetings

Sibyl, Todd will come early

Xiaodong, Kimberly, Mary Ann will come early, too

No official site-wide meeting; can have conversations during UCLA meeting

WB talks

Paul will talk at plenary - deadline April 16th

WB workshops

Chris sent to Gillian Stanfield

Sent summary around in email

We have 90 minutes

Seven talks - 12-15 minutes each

Ask Chris if you need schedule again

Schedule will appear in meeting agenda? yes

WB table - poster sessions

One booth for WB, one for ParaSite?

Try for two - can use both for both projects

Chris can email Gillian Stanfield, cc Kevin

Any WB posters?

If you want to make one, go for it

Community Annotation poster (Mary Ann, Karen, Ranjana, Daniela) and presence at booth good

Can make a brief comment in abstract about exploring micropublications - err on conservative side for the abstract

Help Desk

RNAseq titles

Move from identifiers to human readable descriptions (50 characters - several lines)

Gary Williams will work on this

Slack

What are people’s thoughts?

Slack features:

Can create channel for specific topics

Doesn’t copy all previous correspondence with each reply

Transparency in that everyone can see all channels

Karen - good for tracking emails, threads, can integrate other tools like github

Michael P. - doesn’t improve the number of incoming communications

Slack implementation still needs improvement especially wrt threading

Can anyone give a definitive answer to why we’re changing? What’s the need?

The idea is that this would replace email

What effect would this have on help desk?

Paul D. - we need to choose and use Slack for the right purposes

Mary Ann - which bit of WB communication is Slack trying to improve?

Chris - intended to consolidate different threads, pipelines into one place

Mary Ann - would external users need to use Slack as well for help?

Raymond - can you know if other people have read the message?

Kevin - no

Other possibility - LINE (Raymond) - could check to see if someone read it

Would this discourage people from using it?

Kevin - SLACK really encourages stream of consciousness writing; this doesn’t happen so much

when composing emails; important information can get lost in the chit chat

Using SLACK for the important exchange of technical information may not be the right medium

Mary Ann - should we try to improve how we use our existing tools, e.g. wiki?

We need Todd to weigh in more here

Someone should check with Richard Durbin’s group to see how they like it

Final decision pending…..


WS248 release

submit news items to Kevin