Difference between revisions of "WBConfCall 2012.12.20-Agenda and Minutes"
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* PIs/Groups need to decide which presentations should be made | * PIs/Groups need to decide which presentations should be made | ||
* share presentations beforehand, so we can coordinate the content | * share presentations beforehand, so we can coordinate the content | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''PK - As part of the MRC grant application the PIs have been discussing rationalisations of priorities for curation. One thing that we have been thinking of how to rationalise is the TierI / Tier II curation split.''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''PS - We should approach curation de vono and forget the history''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''PK - Yes - we should discuss this with the SAB, and at the pre-meeting''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''PS - We could also raise how we prioritise what we do''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''PK - It has been hard to fit justification of the japonica annotation effort into the grant application''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''PK - We should brainstorm ideas for new features for the web at the pre-meeting and in the main meeting to run it by the SAB advisors. This will get them talking about functionality and tools.''' | ||
= Updates from the WormBase Groups [A-Z] = | = Updates from the WormBase Groups [A-Z] = |
Revision as of 17:12, 20 December 2012
Contents
Proposed Model changes
In light of the immanent holiday season and the fact that a number of people have expressed a wish to upload early for WS236, the models were tagged (WS236) on Monday 17th December. This will give people an extra 4 days to prepare uploads if they are planning on uploading in 2012.
There will therefore be no further discussion of these models.
Link to the model changes for WS236: WS236_Models.wrm
PD - The models were signed off early to help people upload early. There were a few issues with one of the modesl but this has been resolved.
Advisory Board Meeting
Some ideas from the previous conference call:
- Advisory Board Meeting wiki for agenda and other meeting details
- what might WormBase want to do in the future?
- what does WormBase need to discuss amongst ourselves?
- ask the advisers beforehand for comments/complaints/idea - Paul Sternberg
- PIs/Groups need to decide which presentations should be made
- share presentations beforehand, so we can coordinate the content
PK - As part of the MRC grant application the PIs have been discussing rationalisations of priorities for curation. One thing that we have been thinking of how to rationalise is the TierI / Tier II curation split.
PS - We should approach curation de vono and forget the history
PK - Yes - we should discuss this with the SAB, and at the pre-meeting
PS - We could also raise how we prioritise what we do
PK - It has been hard to fit justification of the japonica annotation effort into the grant application
PK - We should brainstorm ideas for new features for the web at the pre-meeting and in the main meeting to run it by the SAB advisors. This will get them talking about functionality and tools.
Updates from the WormBase Groups [A-Z]
Caltech
Hinxton
OICR
WASHU
HelpDesk
- next one is Daniel Wang
open tickets
from: https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues?labels=HelpDesk&state=open
notable ones:
#702 Pecan syntenic alignments track