Difference between revisions of "Textpresso Central"
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Pros: sentences are seen on the same page as annotations | Pros: sentences are seen on the same page as annotations | ||
+ | |||
form pre-populates curation fields with protein names, category terms, and suggested annotations | form pre-populates curation fields with protein names, category terms, and suggested annotations | ||
+ | |||
easy to mark sentences if not curatable | easy to mark sentences if not curatable | ||
Cons: duplicating or making multiple annotations is cumbersome | Cons: duplicating or making multiple annotations is cumbersome | ||
+ | |||
don't see term info for proteins or GO terms | don't see term info for proteins or GO terms | ||
+ | |||
don't see additional annotations for proteins mentioned in sentences | don't see additional annotations for proteins mentioned in sentences | ||
Revision as of 21:48, 6 November 2011
General considerations: Specification of data models, markup languages, and flow now is important.
Searching and Category/Ontology Development
- (+) Control panel: loading papers from existing corpora into a viewer, incorporation of PubMed queries; search results will be used to import full text from PMC or journal site
- (+) Development of NLP toolbox: pattern matching, statistics, svm, hmm, crf
- (+) Index of all NLP results for faster querying
- (+) Textpresso Ontology viewer and editor
- (+) Ontology development
- (+) Robust back-end infrastructure with internal Textpresso database holding all annotations
- (+) Querying the curation status of papers
- (+) Add searching for previously made annotations in papers to search capabilities
Viewing
- (+) Viewer: selecting terms, importing them into OA, prepopulating entries of forms; display results from NLP tools; initiate new NLP analyses (pattern matching, statistical, machine learning)
Annotating and Curating
- (+) OA and its interaction with TC
Curators would like to be able to view the search results while curating and make annotations from the true positive sentences.
Currently, for doing this we have:
1) the CCC (Cellular Component Curation) form
Pros: sentences are seen on the same page as annotations
form pre-populates curation fields with protein names, category terms, and suggested annotations
easy to mark sentences if not curatable
Cons: duplicating or making multiple annotations is cumbersome
don't see term info for proteins or GO terms
don't see additional annotations for proteins mentioned in sentences
2) the interaction configuration of the OA
Any others? Ask other WB curators.
- (+) Robust back-end infrastructure with internal Textpresso database holding all annotations.