|
|
(251 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | =September 27 2016=
| |
| | | |
− | ==Agenda==
| |
| | | |
− | 1) Type of submissions
| + | [[File:July2017.png|400px|thumb|center]] |
− | | |
− | * For gene expression micropublications, the submission includes:
| |
− | - reagents used to perform the experiment (transgene, construct, antibody, etc..)
| |
− | | |
− | - the read out of the experiment, i.e. image with pattern description and curated metadata
| |
− | | |
− | * for phenotype micropublications, Nemametrix has 2 kind of tech notes:
| |
− | | |
− | - http://nemametrix.com/trehalose-extends-healthspan-c-elegans/
| |
− | | |
− | - http://nemametrix.com/microfluidic-epg-recordings-diverse-nematode-species/
| |
− | | |
− | the first one falls into the micropublication scope, the second is more like a Worm Breeder's Gazette article. Discuss.
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | 2) Workflow
| |
− | | |
− | * from Submission through the form till acceptance by a reviewer we need to track the submission and store metadata in a proper way. Are we going to:
| |
− | | |
− | - outsource to e-journal press or similar?
| |
− | | |
− | - develop in house? Need developer time, Who is going to do it
| |
− | | |
− | [[File:Workflow.png|thumb|left]] | |
− | | |
− | [[File:Tasks.png|thumb|center]]
| |
− | | |
− | [[File:Time.png|thumb|center]]
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | 3) Editorial Board
| |
− | | |
− | *if we start a journal we need an EIC (Paul?) and an editorial board.Who will select and contact the potential editorial board, when.
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | 4) Need alternative title than 'Micropublication: biology' as colons can give problems for downstream XREF (from G3 experience)
| |