Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (→July 5, 2018) |
m |
||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
* Curation First Pass: are forms still used? | * Curation First Pass: are forms still used? | ||
* TFP (Textpresso first pass) not currently used? | * TFP (Textpresso first pass) not currently used? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == July 19, 2018 == |
Revision as of 15:23, 19 July 2018
Contents
Previous Years
GoToMeeting link: https://www.gotomeet.me/wormbase1
2018 Meetings
July 5, 2018
Community Curation Mass Email update
- Emails (1 per paper) sent (most batches 75 at a time): 3,227 total
- June 11: 5
- June 20: 15
- June 21: 82
- June 22: 6
- June 25: 75
- June 26: 80
- June 28: 363
- June 29: 600
- June 30: 300
- July 1: 450
- July 2: 1,251
- Email success rate:
- 482 emails bounced (15%)
- 74 bounced emails had a backup email (2%)
- 292 bounced emails had no backup (12%)
- 88% of emails were successfully sent
- 52 out of office replies (2%)
- 482 emails bounced (15%)
- Total community annotations received since June 11: 718 (115 papers)
- June 13: 24 (3 papers)
- June 14: 8 (3 papers)
- June 17: 1 (1 paper)
- June 20: 13 (3 papers)
- June 21: 13 (4 papers)
- June 25: 13 (4 papers)
- June 26: 20 (7 papers)
- June 28: 17 (8 papers)
- June 29: 131 (8 papers)
- June 30: 4 (2 papers)
- July 1: 24 (5 papers)
- July 2: 184 (36 papers)
- July 3: 179 (20 papers)
- July 4: 27 (9 papers)
- July 5: 62 (pre-meeting) (4 papers)
- We may want to give people the option to "opt-out" either for a paper or for all emails or both
- May be good to ask SAB and users at meetings how they feel about these email requests
- Is it worthwhile to send requests about same paper to same people after a wait period?
SAB Literature Curation overview
- Outline: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OUHoFYC3deEmZvgzmOtmxpt5iBrVio9sAZG66kRHwsE/edit?usp=sharing
- Want to ask about:
- Data type history, current types, priorities going forward?
- Community curation? Pilot results, should we expand?
- Data type vs. topic-based curation?
- Val Wood and PomBase have found topic-based curation to be more efficient
- Alliance working groups:
- data type focused
- Has affected our curation approach
WS267 Citace upload
- July 20th, upload to Hinxton
- July 17th, local CIT upload
Model changes
- Some minor tag name changes
- Changes to GO_annotation to accommodate RO terms
Curation Status Form: flagged vs. validated papers
- Papers validated by curators are not necessarily considered flagged
- Author first pass forms: prepopulated with SVM, string-matches
- Curation First Pass: are forms still used?
- TFP (Textpresso first pass) not currently used?