Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 78: Line 78:
 
** What group or groups does the use case working group need to hand off tasks to?
 
** What group or groups does the use case working group need to hand off tasks to?
 
** What overall decisions about technologies need to be made about AGR before implementing use cases?
 
** What overall decisions about technologies need to be made about AGR before implementing use cases?
 +
 +
=== Person Lineage graph ===
 +
* current view [http://juancarlos.wormbase.org/resources/person/WBPerson363#02--10 Low complexity person], [http://juancarlos.wormbase.org/resources/person/WBPerson625#02--10 High complexity person]

Revision as of 19:12, 10 November 2016

Previous Years

2009 Meetings

2011 Meetings

2012 Meetings

2013 Meetings

2014 Meetings

2015 Meetings


2016 Meetings

January

February

March

April

May

June

July

August

September

October


November 3, 2016

Micropublication update

  • First Nemametrix micro in for WS257
  • Two lined up for WS258
  • Karen and Daniela in touch with e-publishing platforms (HighWire [1], Collaborative knowledge foundation[2]), to set up collaborations for the Micropublication: biology e-journal [3]
  • Discussing putting worm breeder's gazette articles into micropublications
  • Collaborative knowledge foundation is a non-profit publisher, some former member of Highwire
  • Would be good to have a faster way to display micropublications (standard WB pipeline needs at least 4 months)
    • Could use content management systems (CMSs)
  • Maybe will propose a workshop for the 2017 international C. elegans meeting

Intellectual (Person) Lineage

Tim Schedl visiting WB tomorrow

  • Will come to WB CIT around 11:30am


November 10, 2016

Update from AGR portal use case working group

  • Preparing document for the Dec. 6th leadership meeting
  • Need to address several questions about prototype development process
  • Communication has been insufficient, leading to a lag in use case implementation and possibly off-target expectations
  • Working group would like to know:
    • What are the boundaries of responsibility for the use case working group?
    • Will there be a data integration working group to collect data as required for a use case?
    • What group or groups does the use case working group need to hand off tasks to?
    • What overall decisions about technologies need to be made about AGR before implementing use cases?

Person Lineage graph