Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 94: Line 94:
 
*Mass mailings should be an Opt-in system, as opposed to blanket mass mailings
 
*Mass mailings should be an Opt-in system, as opposed to blanket mass mailings
 
*One mass mail for each to ask about Opting-in to e-mail alerts?
 
*One mass mail for each to ask about Opting-in to e-mail alerts?
*Regional & International worm meetings; hand all e-mails over to meeting organizers?
+
*Regional & International worm meetings; don't hand all e-mails over to meeting organizers.
  
  

Revision as of 20:12, 13 September 2012

2009 Meetings

2011 Meetings


2012 Meetings

January

February

March

April

May

June

July

August


September 6, 2012

Canopus

  • Will become a server (heavy outside access)
  • Raymond will take precautions to restore properly; should take a week or less
  • Used for:
    • Picture curation
    • Virtual worm web page & FTP


Grant Writing

  • Approach & future plans - do we need to discuss and add more to proposal?
  • Virtual worm access to data
  • Browsing data
    • Browse genes/proteins by class/GO annotation
  • Intermine queries
    • Queries can be saved and used again later (available to other users)
    • Results can be stored and displayed on web pages
  • Displaying large scale expression (microarray) data (from SPELL)
    • SPELL data currently stored in relational (MySQL?) form
    • We could extend the WormBase web app to interact with SPELL data
    • RESTful-compliant data serving would be best


Migration away from ACEDB?

  • Scalability - ACEDB does not scale to genome-scale studies
  • We (EBI & OICR) spend a lot of time building ACEDB database
  • ACEDB not actually used so much
  • Makes more sense to adopt a more central database
  • Migration would take place over entire grant cycle
  • We should continue extending models as we see fit, in the meantime


Massmails

  • Discuss again with Paul about Worm Breeder's Gazette and WormBook.


September 13, 2012

Grant

  • Two things to work on:
    • 1) Metrics and quality control
      • Metrics: Transparent about our coverage (e.g. "We estimate XXX many RNAi experiments/papers and we have ~62% coverage")
        • SVM form (in development) vs Curation Status form (needs work/update); can generate numbers for coverage to display on the web?
        • What is the vision of a new Curation Status form? (Daniela will write something)
        • Stats with new SVM results on pre-2000 papers: state them in grant as pre-2000 corpus
      • Quality Control: How do we demonstrate that our curation is correct/accurate?
        • Sampling First-pass curation (false negative estimates)
        • WormBase person would check on case-by-case basis the accuracy of data (e.g. expression pattern, RNAi experiment, etc.); what percent do you need to check to ensure good quality control? Blind/independent re-curation? Collection of facts to use for metrics
        • Contact senior author on a paper to check the quality of data from a paper; experts for a process; prioritize based on who responds to author-first-pass
        • Data-type specific issues
        • Internal consistency checks
        • Ontology based curation checks (granularity; branch-consistency)
    • 2) Training and user interaction
      • Screencasts and FAQs list (Chris will write some sentences)
      • User guide status? Currently needs major revamp and new information (old Wiki User Guide is now obsolete)
      • Online chat: has been broken for months; should it only be allowed for logged-in users?
  • Daily updates with low-connectivity data (not relying on sequence mapping) from PostgreSQL database?
    • Have different CGI forms to populate the data on the website?
  • Are we committed to migrating away from ACEDB? Who then is responsible for managing data models?
    • Migrate to Chado? Do we need detailed plan for this?
    • FlyBase has migrated; they like Chado, but the migration was painful


Worm Breeder's Gazette & WormBook outreach

  • Mass mailings should be an Opt-in system, as opposed to blanket mass mailings
  • One mass mail for each to ask about Opting-in to e-mail alerts?
  • Regional & International worm meetings; don't hand all e-mails over to meeting organizers.


Itai Yanai expression datasets

  • Including images from microarray expression data directly from paper for now
  • Plan is to generate time-course expression data 'on-the-fly' later on so that other data sources can be compared and included in the same graph, given that they are the same type of data
  • Eventually, the paper images will be superceded by the new, calculated 'on-the-fly' images


Phenotype Images?