Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(696 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_2018|2018 Meetings]]
 
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_2018|2018 Meetings]]
  
 +
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_2019|2019 Meetings]]
  
GoToMeeting link: https://www.gotomeet.me/wormbase1
+
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_2020|2020 Meetings]]
  
  
= 2019 Meetings =
+
= 2021 Meetings =
  
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_January_2019|January]]
+
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_January_2021|January]]
  
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_February_2019|February]]
 
  
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_March_2019|March]]
+
== Feb 4th, 2021 ==
 +
===How the "duplicate" function works in OAs with respect to object IDs (Ranjana and Juancarlos)===
 +
*A word of caution: when you duplicate a row, for those OAs with Object IDs (eg., WBGenotype00000014) note that the object ID gets duplicated as well and does not advance to the next ID like the PGID does
 +
*If you do use the "duplicate" function, remember to manually change the Object ID
 +
* We can implement checks to make sure distinct annotations/objects don't share the same ID
  
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_April_2019|April]]
+
=== GAF Wiki and headers ===
 +
* Any more comments about the Wiki page and the proposal? https://wiki.wormbase.org/index.php/WormBase_gene_association_file
  
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_May_2019|May]]
+
=== Missing references in expression GAFs ===
 +
* ~300 missing from anatomy association file and ~45 missing from development association file
 +
* Daniela looking into missing refs; many are personal communications or very old papers
 +
* Will change ?Expr_pattern model to possibly remove ?Author reference and add in a ?Person reference instead
 +
** 399 objects in WS279 reference an author; Daniela will take a look
 +
* Would be good to have some reference for those objects in the GAF file on the FTP site; could use WBPerson when ready
  
  
== June 6, 2019 ==
+
== Feb 11th, 2021 ==
 +
=== Alliance Literature Paper Tags ===
 +
*What do we definitely want to transfer to the Alliance?
 +
*Alliance literature group [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1d3Y73x1BFiARkbxrvPPX2tCh5rFeBQRoBMHOcaXmijA/edit#gid=1866989939 spreadsheet]
 +
*Current flags vs legacy flags
 +
*Can we map everything to the proposed hierarchy or do we need to add some more classes?
 +
*Kimberly will review existing tags/flags to sort out what we know we need and what is questionable
  
=== New SObA graphs ===
+
=== Personal communications in Expr_pattern ===
* May put graphs within existing widgets, but don't need to rush to get that ready for IWM
+
* 27 objects missing reference (personal communications)
 +
** Even if we capture the WBPerson in the Person tag, how are we submitting these to Alliance? The evidence required by the expression JSON spec https://github.com/alliance-genome/agr_schemas/blob/master/ingest/expression/wildtypeExpressionModelAnnotation.json (and other specs) must be a publication, as defined by the publicationRef.json https://github.com/alliance-genome/agr_schemas/blob/master/ingest/publicationRef.json. If there's no PMID for a publication listed as evidence, a MOD ID will suffice for the "publicationId" but we have no WBPaperID created for such  objects.
 +
** One way to solve this: Daniela can go over the list and see if the initial personal communication resulted in  a publication later on. One example is Expr181 (expression of cpl-1 in hypodermis and pharynx), communicated  via email by Sarwar Hashmi in 2000, Expr450 (expression of cpl-1 in hypodermis, intestine) communicated by  Britton in 2001. The pattern was published in 2002 by Hashmi and Britton in 2002 (WBPaper00005099). Daniela can then associate WBPaper00005099 to Expr181 and Expr450.
 +
** The solution above still  does not work for all: An example is lad-2 personal communication from Oliver Hobert, 2002. Later published by Lishia Chen (2008). Removing Oliver’s personal communication will remove evidence of data provenance from the Hobert’s lab. Unless Oliver published this in a paper that was eluded from our flagging system (e.g. flagged SVM negative).
 +
** Daniela can go over the entire list and contact the authors for such cases.
 +
** Are personal communications used in other classes?
 +
** Action item: Daniela will add Persons in the person tag for such communications. Will request a model change to Hinxton. Will ask Magda to populate column 6 of the GAF file with Author data. Will add a request for the DQMs to allow Persons in the 'Evidence' in the JSON in addition to Papers
  
=== Phenotype association file format ===
+
=== Author data in Expr_pattern ===
* May be best to leave the format as is
+
* 399 Expression objects have the author tag populated. Most of them were submitted even prior Wen started working on Expr_pattern.
* There are problems; paper IDs keep switching columns
+
** out of 399 objects, we have 32 for which the authors partially match. One example is Expr60, which has Bauer as extra author in the .ace file. Bauer is not listed as author in the paper.
* Would need to revisit the reasoning for why we do it that way
+
** should we keep the author info and store it in the Person tag? Even if we do, how are we submitting these to Alliance? And should we at all? This is legacy data
* When will the Alliance produce a similar/replacement file? Not sure
+
** Decision: we can remove the authors and add in the remarks the historic info
  
=== Phenotype requests ===
+
=== Date tag in Expr_pattern ===
* Sent out 1140 emails on May 30
+
* The date tag seems to be  populated for objects that have authors (above) to probably capture when the submission occurred.
* Since have received 374 annotations from 54 papers (42 requested, 12 additional)
+
* In addition, Date is populated for a large scale submission from Ian hope (2006-03), later published.
* 21 papers flagged as not having phenotypes
+
* We can still keep this info as is for WB (currently stored in citace minus) but what are we going to do for the Alliance submission? The tag was used last time in 2006 for the Hope study but prior to this was used in  the ‘90s (1990, 1998).
* Of 1140 papers emailed about, 35 emails bounced, and have received some flagging or curation on 63 (63/1105 = ~6% response rate), in first week
+
** We  can get rid of date, too. And pull the fo for the ones for which authors do not match
  
 +
=== Proposed WormBase metrics page ===
 +
* Inspired by MGI's stats page:
 +
** http://www.informatics.jax.org/mgihome/homepages/stats/all_stats.shtml
 +
* Sibyl and Paulo working on. Prototype here: https://master.d25n59ij2csrbn.amplifyapp.com/
 +
** Current prototype is C. elegans specific
 +
* Chris is collecting ideas and queries here:
 +
** https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OeZuMRSHelVD7tGRIxEkCKOyDaBPN29wrGbNU3TGxKU/edit?usp=sharing
 +
* Could eventually be used across the Alliance
  
== June 13, 2019 ==
 
  
=== IWM ===
+
== Feb 18th, 2021 ==
* Coordinating transportation of swag boxes to Pauley Pavilion
 
* Workshop on Saturday June 22, from 1pm to 2:30pm
 
* Saturday morning micropublication breakfast 7:30 - 8:30am
 
* Workshop
 
** Presenters: it may be best to present as use cases rather than a research project
 
** Chris will cover SimpleMine for Wen
 
** Chris: won't do live demo; only screenshots, maybe some video
 
* Paul's lab will do marathon bibs to show lab affiliation and graphical abstract
 
* Paul's talk
 
** Cover Alliance
 
** New features
 
*** SObA (for new data)
 
*** Complete for protein-protein interactions
 
*** RNASeq tools
 
*** Updated automated gene concise descriptions?
 
** Phenotype community curation
 
*** Chris will send Paul numbers on: top community curators, overall stats (number of annotations, papers, curators)
 
** Author First Pass
 
** Micropublication
 
  
=== SGD SAB ===
+
=== CenGen data ===
* Paul attended
+
* How can we incorporate the CenGen data into WormBase pages? i.e. provide users info:
* Alliance publicity was discussed
+
** Per gene: what cells express this gene?
* SAB likes the Alliance orthology features
+
** Per cell: what genes are expressed in this cell?
* Working on topics: displaying papers and data
+
** May be derived from Eduardo's data processing
* Pathways: discussion about best approach
+
* CenGen has a weekly call: have invited Wen, Daniela, and Raymond
* Metabolic engineering
+
** Too much for all three to join?
* Meta data about RNASeq data
+
* Good to establish healthy boundaries for responsibilities
** SPELL tool, basically only tool of its kind available; need new tools
+
* Do they want to collaborate or no?
* Species-specific proteins: how best to find them? HMMs (Jackhammer)?
+
* We can link to the main CenGen page; once gene-level data is available we can consume and make available
 +
* Eduardo's tool is one WormBase tool for processing and providing CenGen data; will make them aware
 +
* Ultimately this data (and its presentation) will need to get into the Alliance; may remain a WB-specific/portal feature for the near future
 +
* Alaska? Probably won't be maintained
  
=== Concise descriptions ===
+
=== Cleaning up bounced emails to outreach@wormbase.org ===
* Progress being made within the Alliance to update the automated concise gene descriptions
+
* Many unread messages (~140) in inbox
* We will still accept manually written descriptions and display them in parallel with automated descriptions
+
* Many of those are bounced emails from AFP pipeline and webinar announcements
 +
* If relevant people could review those bounced emails and, as appropriate, add people or email addresses to the Omit list using the Omit Form CGI (http://tazendra.caltech.edu/~postgres/cgi-bin/omit_form.cgi) that would be appreciated.
  
=== Micropublications ===
 
* If people are requesting manually written gene descriptions, they could submit a microreview
 
* Concern was expressed about how to handle a really high throughput of submissions:
 
** Daniela: Working towards automating as much of the processing pipeline as possible
 
** Raymond: The throughput will be handled appropriately depending on demand; priority scheme will help
 
** Not getting lots of submissions yet, probably won't be inundated in the near future
 
** Karen: tools are still being developed; the platform is not being advertised as much as it could be; will ramp up outreach and communication once tools are in place to handle more submissions
 
* Karen: Micropublications team will reach out to curators to help build submission forms for respective data types
 
  
=== Undiagnosed Disease Network data ===
+
== Feb 25th, 2021 ==
* Andy Golden will meet with Ranjana and Chris at IWM to discuss
 
* Andy asked about protocol pages at WormBase?
 
* Paul: Bioprotocols and Protocols IO
 
* Maybe we could interface with those existing resources to link to relevant protocols from WormBase (and WormBook)
 
  
 +
===Expr_pattern clean up===
 +
* Seldom populated  tags. Can we move the associated info into remarks and get rid of the tag? This is in view of the Alliance import
 +
** Protein_description 33 objects -> Decision: Move to remarks -> Done DR 2021/02/26. Redundant info such as CPL-1 in Protein_description and CPL-1 in gene name were omitted.
 +
<pre>Example: Expr_pattern : "Expr450"
 +
Gene "WBGene00000776"
 +
Protein_description "CPL-1"
  
==June 27th, 2019==
+
Expr_pattern : "Expr552"
===IWM 2019: Feedback from Users===
+
Gene "WBGene00006528"
* Anatomy term synonym search
+
Protein_description "Tubulin alpha"</pre>
** User pointed out that "RnB" search returns 0 results; GitHub ticket made to index anatomy synonyms
 
* Ciliated neurons
 
** User pointed out that male ciliated neurons are missing as a subclass of term "ciliated neuron"; GitHub ticket made, easy fix
 
* Import of 22G and 26G RNAs
 
** Spoke to Julie Claycomb
 
** These are short RNAs transcribed by RNA-dependent RNA Polymerase (RdRP) off of mRNA molecules
 
** Should these be instantiated as gene objects in WormBase? Julie argues that these are not genes
 
*** Should these just be transcript objects? Would they be linked to a gene? Or maybe also to any transcripts from which they could be derived?
 
** Many map uniquely to the genome, but some map in multiple locations
 
** Associated data for now would likely just be protein-RNA interactions (Argonaute-RNA interactions)
 
*** May eventually include phenotype and/or gene ontology (biological process) annotations
 
* Ranjana & Chris spoke with Andy Golden
 
** Andy and his lab will submit phenotype and disease data as they become available (likely pre-publication); we will likely point to a consortium as source until paper is published
 
** There is still a strong need for cross-species variant mapping/visualization
 
* miRNA binding sites
 
** User asked at workshop and at booth; can we show miRNA binding sites in JBrowse? We would need to collect the data
 
** There are many sources of miRNA-target interactions, some experimental, most predicted
 
*** Chris compiled [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19-txXrGi-ROFuByyLnQYvWbKl3o12KZON56qto3MN6g/edit?usp=sharing list of interaction databases] for Alliance interactions working group
 
* Ontology aware diffs of annotations (gene1 expression vs. gene2 expression)
 
* Promoter sequence in experimental constructs
 
* Workshop went well
 
** Next time, maybe have people bring laptops and follow along; be more interactive
 
** We could do webinars, for WormMine for example, allow people to work along with the presentation
 
*** Do other MODs/groups do webinars? How have they been? Useful?
 
** Competing with other workshops during the IWM
 
** Can focus on new, less-used features for webinars, tutorial videos
 
* Hawaiian genome in JBrowse
 
* Had internet stability issues at UCLA; can we get a local, dedicated WiFi?
 
* Next meeting (2021) will likely be in Europe (Cambridge UK?)
 
* User at cGal workshop asked about tissue-specific promoters/transgenes
 
** Have ~30 drivers and ~30 effectors; will WB take them in unpublished? Could make BioRChiv preprint (quick, before peer-review) and/or micropublication (after peer-review)
 
* Protocols
 
** Would be good to establish (for Alliance/WB) framework for serving protocols maintained by community
 
  
=== TAGC meeting ===
+
** Sequence 12 objects -> Decision: Move to remarks
* Next April (2020)
+
<pre>Example: Expr_pattern : "Expr12"
* Alliance representation needed
+
      Gene "WBGene00003976"
 +
      Sequence "Z28377|Z28375|Z28376"</pre>
  
===Giving disease model annotations a stable identifier===
+
** Laboratory 23 objects -> can infer via publication -> Decision: good to ignore
*Currently disease model annotations get a temporary ID at the time of dump,
+
<pre>Example: Expr_pattern : "Expr87"
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap;
+
        …
white-space: -moz-pre-wrap;
+
Laboratory "ML"
white-space: -pre-wrap;
+
Gene "WBGene00003012"</pre>
white-space: -o-pre-wrap;
 
word-wrap: break-word">
 
Disease_model_annotation : "00000004"
 
Disease_term "DOID:0050833"
 
Disease_of_species "Homo sapiens"
 
Variation "WBVar00275555"
 
Disease_relevant_gene "WBGene00011559"
 
Inferred_gene "WBGene00011559"
 
Association_type "is_implicated_in"
 
Evidence_code "IMP"
 
Genetic_sex "hermaphrodite"
 
Paper_evidence "WBPaper00035924"
 
Database "OMIM" "gene" "613891 "
 
Database "OMIM" "disease" "258900"
 
Curator_confirmed "WBPerson324"
 
Date_last_updated "2017-04-24"
 
</pre>
 
*Would like to institute stable identifiers across releases, so the plan is to call these objects, 'WBDisease_annotation:<number>', so then the above identifier would become 'WBDisease_annotation:00000004', or 'WBDiseaseannot:00000004' or 'WBDiseaseAnnot:00000004'
 
*ID convention--is underscore allowed?
 
*Is 'WBDisease_annotation:00000004' too long for acedb?
 
* Need to ask Kevin, Hinxton; what are the other implications for maintaining and generating persistent, unique IDs
 
  
=== Anatomy ontology issues ===
+
 
* Currently, "intestinal muscle" is considered "part of" intestine
+
* Empty tags. Can remove tags from WB Expression model? Yes
** User asked for intestinally expressed genes; using WOBr would also retrieve genes in intestinal muscle
+
** Cell -> 0 objects
** David Hall confirmed that instestinal muscle cells are not part of intestine
+
** Expressed_in -> 0 objects
** Maybe we can change to: "intestinal muscle" part_of "alimentary system"
+
** Protein -> 0 objects
* Currently, "amphid process" is considered "part of" each type of amphid neuron like AWC, AFD, etc.
+
** Pseudogene -> 0 objects
** Problem is that users looking in WOBr for AWC-expressed genes will be given genes expressed in ANY amphid process regardless of which cell
+
 
** Propose to change to: "amphid process" part_of "amphid neuron" only
+
 
 +
* Microarray, Tiling Array, RNAseq associations -> Discuss with  the Expression WG how to bring in images for these and treat as image  objects liked to the high  throughput data
 +
**Microarray, Microarray_results
 +
<pre>example: Expr1050000 -Yanai study
 +
Currently accessible via the schema
 +
https://wormbase.org/species/c_briggsae/expr_pattern/Expr1050000#0123--10</pre>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
**Tiling_array
 +
<pre>Example: Expr1040545 - Miller study
 +
Currently accessible via the schema
 +
https://wormbase.org/species/all/expr_pattern/Expr1040545#0123--10</pre>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
**RNASeq
 +
<pre>Example:
 +
Expr_pattern : "Expr1142792" - Yanai study
 +
Gene "WBGene00007063"
 +
RNASeq "RNASeq_Study.SRP029448"
 +
Currently accessible  via the  schema
 +
https://wormbase.org/species/all/expr_pattern/Expr1142792#0123--10</pre>
 +
 
 +
* Others
 +
** Historical_gene -> 51 objects. How are historical gene tags treated for other classes in Alliance? -> keep in Alliance and maintain the same mechanism when  curation will be moved over
 +
** EPIC -> Ad hoc Tag for Murray, no correspondence with method ontology terms -> ok to ignore
 +
** Species -> what are we doing with non elegans annotations?
 +
** MovieURL -> 32 - Mohler -> move to movies -> talk again with Raymond
 +
 
 +
===Braun Server Room===
 +
* Manager Dave Mathog retired. Uncertain about its management or fate.

Latest revision as of 17:40, 26 February 2021

Previous Years

2009 Meetings

2011 Meetings

2012 Meetings

2013 Meetings

2014 Meetings

2015 Meetings

2016 Meetings

2017 Meetings

2018 Meetings

2019 Meetings

2020 Meetings


2021 Meetings

January


Feb 4th, 2021

How the "duplicate" function works in OAs with respect to object IDs (Ranjana and Juancarlos)

  • A word of caution: when you duplicate a row, for those OAs with Object IDs (eg., WBGenotype00000014) note that the object ID gets duplicated as well and does not advance to the next ID like the PGID does
  • If you do use the "duplicate" function, remember to manually change the Object ID
  • We can implement checks to make sure distinct annotations/objects don't share the same ID

GAF Wiki and headers

Missing references in expression GAFs

  • ~300 missing from anatomy association file and ~45 missing from development association file
  • Daniela looking into missing refs; many are personal communications or very old papers
  • Will change ?Expr_pattern model to possibly remove ?Author reference and add in a ?Person reference instead
    • 399 objects in WS279 reference an author; Daniela will take a look
  • Would be good to have some reference for those objects in the GAF file on the FTP site; could use WBPerson when ready


Feb 11th, 2021

Alliance Literature Paper Tags

  • What do we definitely want to transfer to the Alliance?
  • Alliance literature group spreadsheet
  • Current flags vs legacy flags
  • Can we map everything to the proposed hierarchy or do we need to add some more classes?
  • Kimberly will review existing tags/flags to sort out what we know we need and what is questionable

Personal communications in Expr_pattern

  • 27 objects missing reference (personal communications)
    • Even if we capture the WBPerson in the Person tag, how are we submitting these to Alliance? The evidence required by the expression JSON spec https://github.com/alliance-genome/agr_schemas/blob/master/ingest/expression/wildtypeExpressionModelAnnotation.json (and other specs) must be a publication, as defined by the publicationRef.json https://github.com/alliance-genome/agr_schemas/blob/master/ingest/publicationRef.json. If there's no PMID for a publication listed as evidence, a MOD ID will suffice for the "publicationId" but we have no WBPaperID created for such objects.
    • One way to solve this: Daniela can go over the list and see if the initial personal communication resulted in a publication later on. One example is Expr181 (expression of cpl-1 in hypodermis and pharynx), communicated via email by Sarwar Hashmi in 2000, Expr450 (expression of cpl-1 in hypodermis, intestine) communicated by Britton in 2001. The pattern was published in 2002 by Hashmi and Britton in 2002 (WBPaper00005099). Daniela can then associate WBPaper00005099 to Expr181 and Expr450.
    • The solution above still does not work for all: An example is lad-2 personal communication from Oliver Hobert, 2002. Later published by Lishia Chen (2008). Removing Oliver’s personal communication will remove evidence of data provenance from the Hobert’s lab. Unless Oliver published this in a paper that was eluded from our flagging system (e.g. flagged SVM negative).
    • Daniela can go over the entire list and contact the authors for such cases.
    • Are personal communications used in other classes?
    • Action item: Daniela will add Persons in the person tag for such communications. Will request a model change to Hinxton. Will ask Magda to populate column 6 of the GAF file with Author data. Will add a request for the DQMs to allow Persons in the 'Evidence' in the JSON in addition to Papers

Author data in Expr_pattern

  • 399 Expression objects have the author tag populated. Most of them were submitted even prior Wen started working on Expr_pattern.
    • out of 399 objects, we have 32 for which the authors partially match. One example is Expr60, which has Bauer as extra author in the .ace file. Bauer is not listed as author in the paper.
    • should we keep the author info and store it in the Person tag? Even if we do, how are we submitting these to Alliance? And should we at all? This is legacy data
    • Decision: we can remove the authors and add in the remarks the historic info

Date tag in Expr_pattern

  • The date tag seems to be populated for objects that have authors (above) to probably capture when the submission occurred.
  • In addition, Date is populated for a large scale submission from Ian hope (2006-03), later published.
  • We can still keep this info as is for WB (currently stored in citace minus) but what are we going to do for the Alliance submission? The tag was used last time in 2006 for the Hope study but prior to this was used in the ‘90s (1990, 1998).
    • We can get rid of date, too. And pull the fo for the ones for which authors do not match

Proposed WormBase metrics page


Feb 18th, 2021

CenGen data

  • How can we incorporate the CenGen data into WormBase pages? i.e. provide users info:
    • Per gene: what cells express this gene?
    • Per cell: what genes are expressed in this cell?
    • May be derived from Eduardo's data processing
  • CenGen has a weekly call: have invited Wen, Daniela, and Raymond
    • Too much for all three to join?
  • Good to establish healthy boundaries for responsibilities
  • Do they want to collaborate or no?
  • We can link to the main CenGen page; once gene-level data is available we can consume and make available
  • Eduardo's tool is one WormBase tool for processing and providing CenGen data; will make them aware
  • Ultimately this data (and its presentation) will need to get into the Alliance; may remain a WB-specific/portal feature for the near future
  • Alaska? Probably won't be maintained

Cleaning up bounced emails to outreach@wormbase.org

  • Many unread messages (~140) in inbox
  • Many of those are bounced emails from AFP pipeline and webinar announcements
  • If relevant people could review those bounced emails and, as appropriate, add people or email addresses to the Omit list using the Omit Form CGI (http://tazendra.caltech.edu/~postgres/cgi-bin/omit_form.cgi) that would be appreciated.


Feb 25th, 2021

Expr_pattern clean up

  • Seldom populated tags. Can we move the associated info into remarks and get rid of the tag? This is in view of the Alliance import
    • Protein_description 33 objects -> Decision: Move to remarks -> Done DR 2021/02/26. Redundant info such as CPL-1 in Protein_description and CPL-1 in gene name were omitted.
Example: Expr_pattern : "Expr450"
	Gene	 "WBGene00000776"
	Protein_description	 "CPL-1"

	Expr_pattern : "Expr552"
	Gene	 "WBGene00006528"
	Protein_description	 "Tubulin alpha"
    • Sequence 12 objects -> Decision: Move to remarks
Example: Expr_pattern : "Expr12"
		      Gene	 "WBGene00003976"
		      Sequence	 "Z28377|Z28375|Z28376"
    • Laboratory 23 objects -> can infer via publication -> Decision: good to ignore
Example: Expr_pattern : "Expr87"
        …
	Laboratory	 "ML"
	Gene	 "WBGene00003012"


  • Empty tags. Can remove tags from WB Expression model? Yes
    • Cell -> 0 objects
    • Expressed_in -> 0 objects
    • Protein -> 0 objects
    • Pseudogene -> 0 objects


  • Microarray, Tiling Array, RNAseq associations -> Discuss with the Expression WG how to bring in images for these and treat as image objects liked to the high throughput data
    • Microarray, Microarray_results
example: Expr1050000 -Yanai study
Currently accessible via the schema
https://wormbase.org/species/c_briggsae/expr_pattern/Expr1050000#0123--10


    • Tiling_array
Example: Expr1040545 - Miller study
Currently accessible via the schema
https://wormbase.org/species/all/expr_pattern/Expr1040545#0123--10


    • RNASeq
Example: 
	Expr_pattern : "Expr1142792" - Yanai study
	Gene	 "WBGene00007063"
	RNASeq	 "RNASeq_Study.SRP029448"
Currently accessible  via the  schema
https://wormbase.org/species/all/expr_pattern/Expr1142792#0123--10
  • Others
    • Historical_gene -> 51 objects. How are historical gene tags treated for other classes in Alliance? -> keep in Alliance and maintain the same mechanism when curation will be moved over
    • EPIC -> Ad hoc Tag for Murray, no correspondence with method ontology terms -> ok to ignore
    • Species -> what are we doing with non elegans annotations?
    • MovieURL -> 32 - Mohler -> move to movies -> talk again with Raymond

Braun Server Room

  • Manager Dave Mathog retired. Uncertain about its management or fate.