Difference between revisions of "WormBase-Caltech Weekly Calls"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search(39 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
[[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_October_2019|October]] | [[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_October_2019|October]] | ||
+ | [[WormBase-Caltech_Weekly_Calls_November_2019|November]] | ||
− | |||
− | === | + | == December 5, 2019 == |
− | |||
− | |||
− | === | + | === New interaction Venn diagram tool === |
− | * [https:// | + | * [https://staging.wormbase.org/species/c_elegans/gene/WBGene00000912#08--10 daf-16 interactions] |
− | * | + | * Venn diagram shows how various interactors have multiple interaction types with a common focus gene |
− | * | + | * For a given selected gene set, you can copy to clipboard, download CSV, TSV, and link to enrichment analysis or WormMine |
− | + | * Very nice! It would be great to have the gene list options here available wherever lists are provided in WormBase (Sibyl working on it) | |
− | + | * Request: add SimpleMine as another link out (go to SimpleMine with the gene list prepopulated) | |
− | + | * Request: could there be a toggle to include/exclude high-throughput interactions? | |
− | + | * Request: The Venn circle labels sometimes get in the way of seeing the diagram; can they be moved to the side or possibly replace simply with single letters like "P", "G" and "R" for "physical", "genetic" and "regulatory" respectively? Might still need a legend? | |
− | + | * Request: Change the wording "Browse selection" to something like "View/analyze gene list" | |
− | + | * Where else could we implement a similar type of Venn diagram tool? Disease or phenotype annotations? | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | * | ||
− | * | ||
− | * | ||
− | * | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | * | ||
− | |||
− | * | ||
− | === | + | === New round of phenotype requests === |
− | * | + | * GMail really throttling email sending |
+ | * Chris will reach out to Google/GMail to see if we can: | ||
+ | ** A) get a clear explanation about what their restrictions are and how they work and | ||
+ | ** B) see if we can get a paid plan to help expedite the email process (see how much cost) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Aligning interaction data with GO and GO-CAM === | ||
+ | * The Alliance interactions working group is considering proposing a greater alignment between GO interaction annotations (like "binding" annotations with IPI evidence codes, for example) and Alliance molecular interaction annotations | ||
+ | * Also, would like to propose a pipeline for possibly automatically generating GO-CAM annotations/networks based on inferences made from phenotype annotations, genetic interactions, regulatory interactions, and molecular interactions | ||
+ | * Much of this depends on genetic perturbation (e.g. allele/variant) annotation to effects, like loss-of-function or gain-of-function annotations | ||
+ | ** Would be good to get a sense from other Alliance members the extent to which we could rely on the presence of such annotations | ||
+ | * Chris and Kimberly will meet to discuss further | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Short SObA talk at Alliance meeting === | ||
+ | * Raymond prepared to give short talk on SObA to the Alliance group | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Single cell data visualization tool === | ||
+ | * Eduardo will present to Paul's lab meeting tomorrow | ||
+ | * Will discuss at Alliance expression working group pre-meeting |
Revision as of 21:08, 5 December 2019
Contents
Previous Years
GoToMeeting link: https://www.gotomeet.me/wormbase1
2019 Meetings
December 5, 2019
New interaction Venn diagram tool
- daf-16 interactions
- Venn diagram shows how various interactors have multiple interaction types with a common focus gene
- For a given selected gene set, you can copy to clipboard, download CSV, TSV, and link to enrichment analysis or WormMine
- Very nice! It would be great to have the gene list options here available wherever lists are provided in WormBase (Sibyl working on it)
- Request: add SimpleMine as another link out (go to SimpleMine with the gene list prepopulated)
- Request: could there be a toggle to include/exclude high-throughput interactions?
- Request: The Venn circle labels sometimes get in the way of seeing the diagram; can they be moved to the side or possibly replace simply with single letters like "P", "G" and "R" for "physical", "genetic" and "regulatory" respectively? Might still need a legend?
- Request: Change the wording "Browse selection" to something like "View/analyze gene list"
- Where else could we implement a similar type of Venn diagram tool? Disease or phenotype annotations?
New round of phenotype requests
- GMail really throttling email sending
- Chris will reach out to Google/GMail to see if we can:
- A) get a clear explanation about what their restrictions are and how they work and
- B) see if we can get a paid plan to help expedite the email process (see how much cost)
Aligning interaction data with GO and GO-CAM
- The Alliance interactions working group is considering proposing a greater alignment between GO interaction annotations (like "binding" annotations with IPI evidence codes, for example) and Alliance molecular interaction annotations
- Also, would like to propose a pipeline for possibly automatically generating GO-CAM annotations/networks based on inferences made from phenotype annotations, genetic interactions, regulatory interactions, and molecular interactions
- Much of this depends on genetic perturbation (e.g. allele/variant) annotation to effects, like loss-of-function or gain-of-function annotations
- Would be good to get a sense from other Alliance members the extent to which we could rely on the presence of such annotations
- Chris and Kimberly will meet to discuss further
Short SObA talk at Alliance meeting
- Raymond prepared to give short talk on SObA to the Alliance group
Single cell data visualization tool
- Eduardo will present to Paul's lab meeting tomorrow
- Will discuss at Alliance expression working group pre-meeting