Model changes for WS246
GO_annotation class - Kimberly
Introduction of this new class to capture Gene::GO associateions and additional meta data associated with a curation event.
Feature - M.A.
Can we remove Annotation and Defined_by_author
Tag additions for connecting ?Picture to ?WBProcess (Topic)
?Picture Depict WBProcess ?WBProcess XREF Picture
?WBProcess Picture ?Picture #Evidence
?WBProcess Picture ?Picture XREF WBProcess #Evidence
Unique -> UNIQUE housekeeping change
Corresponding_transgene Unique ?Transgene XREF Corresponding_variation
Expr_patter - Daniela
I would like to add
Microarray_results ?Microarray_results XREF Expr_Pattern
to the Expr_pattern class
between Expression_cluster ?Expression_cluster XREF Expr_pattern and Pattern ?Text
this will allow to map graphs for expression for remanei, briggsae and japonica to 'gene' through already existing probe-to-genome mappings
Expr_patter 2 - Daniela
I would also like to add a Species tag in the Expr_pattern class
Species UNIQUE ?Species
Wen has two model proposals for WS247:
1. Can we move Microarray_results tag from under "Experimental_info" to under "Molecular_info"?
This tag used to store microarray data, but now it is only used to specify probe names corresponding to this gene. It is better staying under super tag "Molecular_info". This model change should not affect database build or website display.
2. Under ?Expression_cluster model
Regulation Regulated_by_gene ?Gene // Wen WS228 Regulated_by_treatment Text // Wen WS228 Regulated_by_molecule ?Molecule // Wen WS228
Regulation Regulated_by_gene ?Gene XREF Regulate_expr_cluster Regulated_by_treatment Text Regulated_by_molecule ?Molecule XREF Regulate_expr_cluster
Corresponding XREF already exist in ?Gene and ?Molecule class, the XREFs in Expression_cluster were probably forgotten when I proposed them for WS228.