Difference between revisions of "WS247 Models.wrm"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
 +
__TOC__
 
== Model changes for WS246 ==
 
== Model changes for WS246 ==
  
* GO_annotation class - Kimberly
+
== GO_annotation class - Kimberly ==
  
 
Introduction of this new class to capture Gene::GO associateions and additional meta data associated with a curation event.
 
Introduction of this new class to capture Gene::GO associateions and additional meta data associated with a curation event.
  
* Feature - M.A.
+
== Feature - M.A.==
  
 
Can we remove Annotation and Defined_by_author
 
Can we remove Annotation and Defined_by_author
  
* Tag additions for connecting ?Picture to ?WBProcess (Topic)
+
== Tag additions for connecting ?Picture to ?WBProcess (Topic) ==
  
 
Add:
 
Add:
Line 26: Line 28:
 
   Picture  ?Picture  XREF  WBProcess  #Evidence  
 
   Picture  ?Picture  XREF  WBProcess  #Evidence  
  
* Unique -> UNIQUE housekeeping change
+
== Unique -> UNIQUE housekeeping change ==
  
 
  Corresponding_transgene Unique ?Transgene XREF Corresponding_variation
 
  Corresponding_transgene Unique ?Transgene XREF Corresponding_variation
  
* Expr_patter - Daniela
+
== Expr_patter - Daniela ==
  
 
I would like to add
 
I would like to add
Line 45: Line 47:
 
this will allow to map graphs for expression for remanei, briggsae and japonica to 'gene' through already existing probe-to-genome mappings
 
this will allow to map graphs for expression for remanei, briggsae and japonica to 'gene' through already existing probe-to-genome mappings
  
* Expr_patter 2 - Daniela
+
== Expr_patter 2 - Daniela ==
  
 
I would also like to add a Species tag in the Expr_pattern class
 
I would also like to add a Species tag in the Expr_pattern class
Line 51: Line 53:
 
  Species UNIQUE ?Species
 
  Species UNIQUE ?Species
  
* Wen has two model proposals for WS247:
+
== Wen has two model proposals for WS247: ==
  
 
1. Can we move Microarray_results tag from under "Experimental_info" to under "Molecular_info"?
 
1. Can we move Microarray_results tag from under "Experimental_info" to under "Molecular_info"?

Revision as of 11:21, 13 November 2014

Model changes for WS246

GO_annotation class - Kimberly

Introduction of this new class to capture Gene::GO associateions and additional meta data associated with a curation event.

Feature - M.A.

Can we remove Annotation and Defined_by_author

Tag additions for connecting ?Picture to ?WBProcess (Topic)

Add:

?Picture
  Depict  WBProcess  ?WBProcess  XREF  Picture

and change:

?WBProcess
  Picture  ?Picture  #Evidence

to:

?WBProcess
  Picture  ?Picture  XREF  WBProcess  #Evidence 

Unique -> UNIQUE housekeeping change

Corresponding_transgene Unique ?Transgene XREF Corresponding_variation

Expr_patter - Daniela

I would like to add

Microarray_results ?Microarray_results XREF Expr_Pattern

to the Expr_pattern class

between
Expression_cluster ?Expression_cluster XREF Expr_pattern
and	      
Pattern ?Text

this will allow to map graphs for expression for remanei, briggsae and japonica to 'gene' through already existing probe-to-genome mappings

Expr_patter 2 - Daniela

I would also like to add a Species tag in the Expr_pattern class

Species UNIQUE ?Species

Wen has two model proposals for WS247:

1. Can we move Microarray_results tag from under "Experimental_info" to under "Molecular_info"?

This tag used to store microarray data, but now it is only used to specify probe names corresponding to this gene. It is better staying under super tag "Molecular_info". This model change should not affect database build or website display.


2. Under ?Expression_cluster model

Please change:


Regulation   Regulated_by_gene ?Gene                   // Wen WS228
             Regulated_by_treatment Text                // Wen WS228
             Regulated_by_molecule ?Molecule        // Wen WS228


into


Regulation   Regulated_by_gene ?Gene  XREF Regulate_expr_cluster
             Regulated_by_treatment Text
             Regulated_by_molecule ?Molecule XREF Regulate_expr_cluster


Corresponding XREF already exist in ?Gene and ?Molecule class, the XREFs in Expression_cluster were probably forgotten when I proposed them for WS228.