Difference between revisions of "WBConfCall 2022.08.18-Agenda and Minutes"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 9: | Line 9: | ||
** Same study section as FB | ** Same study section as FB | ||
** Focus on new things we are going to do - include details, numbers and deliverables and milestones | ** Focus on new things we are going to do - include details, numbers and deliverables and milestones | ||
− | ** Figure out what type of curation we want to do, prioritize, and put down numbers on how long is going to take. Document on why a certain datatype is important (e.g. expression pattern, phenotype) | + | ** Figure out what type of curation we want to do, prioritize, and put down numbers on how long is going to take. Document on why a certain datatype is important (e.g. expression pattern, phenotype). |
** https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gl2NNsb1I4bBwPHP6Z8xs5cff5FrtnFuWJRedR8Uwo0/edit | ** https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gl2NNsb1I4bBwPHP6Z8xs5cff5FrtnFuWJRedR8Uwo0/edit | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
** Parasite has an expert group (people familiar with the resource), who give more detailed feedback on missing data, how things can be improved on a practical level. Should we consider something like this for WormBase? Paul S.: We can do it | ** Parasite has an expert group (people familiar with the resource), who give more detailed feedback on missing data, how things can be improved on a practical level. Should we consider something like this for WormBase? Paul S.: We can do it | ||
*** Make a doc with a list of focus groups? Tight for the grant, can do for later on. | *** Make a doc with a list of focus groups? Tight for the grant, can do for later on. | ||
+ | **** e.g. 6 people (experts in the field) for datatype | ||
+ | **** focus on new data types, neural connectivity, single cell RNAseq | ||
+ | |||
+ | ** What to do with data such as FPKM displays. Todd: more of a generic question. What are we generally keeping for the transition to Alliance and what are we getting rid of (or display as a per se component). | ||
+ | *** Need a list of all widget. | ||
* Paper corpora for all species [MM & MZ] | * Paper corpora for all species [MM & MZ] |
Revision as of 15:48, 18 August 2022
Agenda and Minutes
- Helpdesk
- Clone, fosmid and cosmid availability [MZ]
- WB grant -> due Thursday September 22nd
- PO still thinking about the LOI
- Same study section as FB
- Focus on new things we are going to do - include details, numbers and deliverables and milestones
- Figure out what type of curation we want to do, prioritize, and put down numbers on how long is going to take. Document on why a certain datatype is important (e.g. expression pattern, phenotype).
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gl2NNsb1I4bBwPHP6Z8xs5cff5FrtnFuWJRedR8Uwo0/edit
- SAB
- We will have one later on, after the grant will be in
- Parasite has an expert group (people familiar with the resource), who give more detailed feedback on missing data, how things can be improved on a practical level. Should we consider something like this for WormBase? Paul S.: We can do it
- Make a doc with a list of focus groups? Tight for the grant, can do for later on.
- e.g. 6 people (experts in the field) for datatype
- focus on new data types, neural connectivity, single cell RNAseq
- Make a doc with a list of focus groups? Tight for the grant, can do for later on.
- What to do with data such as FPKM displays. Todd: more of a generic question. What are we generally keeping for the transition to Alliance and what are we getting rid of (or display as a per se component).
- Need a list of all widget.
- What to do with data such as FPKM displays. Todd: more of a generic question. What are we generally keeping for the transition to Alliance and what are we getting rid of (or display as a per se component).
- Paper corpora for all species [MM & MZ]