Revision as of 16:39, 4 February 2021

Help Desk

Are GAF files C. elegans specific? We have 39 expression annotations to other species (remanei, brenneri, brugia). ok to leave them out? If not, make sure that those Expression_objects don't make it to the GAF.
Chris has written up a Wiki page to point to GAF specifications as well as describe the format details and suggest a new header for each GAF in our FTP "ONTOLOGY" directory
- To resolve GitHub ticket: https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/7900
- Current "ONTOLOGY" directory on FTP: ftp://ftp.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/releases/current-production-release/ONTOLOGY/
- New Wiki page: https://wiki.wormbase.org/index.php/WormBase_gene_association_file
- We would like to push ahead with modifying the headers of these association files

AOB: Dates for WS281 build?

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 * Paper upload directly from authors - https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/8068
 * Paper anatomy function links - https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/8065
+* Miller CeNGEN data links brainstorm - https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/8075
 = Agenda and Minutes=