Revision as of 15:19, 4 February 2021

Help Desk

Are GAF files C. elegans specific? We have 39 expression annotations to other species (remanei, brenneri, brugia). ok to leave them out? If not, make sure that those Expression_objects don't make it to the GAF.
Chris has written up a Wiki page to point to GAF specifications as well as describe the format details and suggest a new header for each GAF in our FTP "ONTOLOGY" directory
- To resolve GitHub ticket: https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/7900
- Current "ONTOLOGY" directory on FTP: ftp://ftp.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/releases/current-production-release/ONTOLOGY/
- New Wiki page: https://wiki.wormbase.org/index.php/WormBase_gene_association_file
- We would like to push ahead with modifying the headers of these association files

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 * ePCR "position" function broken - https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/8081
 * Typo in gene WBGene00019747 name - https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/8080
-* Phenotype community curation recognition - https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/8076
-* Miller CeNGEN data links brainstorm - https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/8075
 * New JBrowse polyA Atlas tracks - https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/8070
 * Paper upload directly from authors - https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/8068