Difference between revisions of "WBConfCall 2020.04.16-Agenda and Minutes"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
As we winnow down the number of items at WormBase.org that directly depend on ACEDB (and there are very few left), we have the graphic generated for protein homology like in the [https://wormbase.org/species/c_elegans/protein/CE28239#3--10 UNC-26, isoform a page] While we can reproduce that image with JBrowse like [http://dev.wormbase.org:9018/?loc=JC8.10a%3A1..1113&tracks=Exon%20boundaries%2CFeatures-seg%2CMotifs%2CSelected%20BLASTP%20Homologies this], it does require jumping through some hoops.  So the question is, do we keep this functionality and jump through those hoops, or should we rework it to be more useful, or do we pitch it altogether?
 
As we winnow down the number of items at WormBase.org that directly depend on ACEDB (and there are very few left), we have the graphic generated for protein homology like in the [https://wormbase.org/species/c_elegans/protein/CE28239#3--10 UNC-26, isoform a page] While we can reproduce that image with JBrowse like [http://dev.wormbase.org:9018/?loc=JC8.10a%3A1..1113&tracks=Exon%20boundaries%2CFeatures-seg%2CMotifs%2CSelected%20BLASTP%20Homologies this], it does require jumping through some hoops.  So the question is, do we keep this functionality and jump through those hoops, or should we rework it to be more useful, or do we pitch it altogether?
  
== Agenda item 2 ==
+
== Help-desk issue ==
 +
1. Looking the promoter to express AVB of C. Elegans (github #7667)
 +
https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/7667

Revision as of 04:41, 16 April 2020

Agenda and Minutes

Reproducing or reworking the "protein schematic" in protein pages

As we winnow down the number of items at WormBase.org that directly depend on ACEDB (and there are very few left), we have the graphic generated for protein homology like in the UNC-26, isoform a page While we can reproduce that image with JBrowse like this, it does require jumping through some hoops. So the question is, do we keep this functionality and jump through those hoops, or should we rework it to be more useful, or do we pitch it altogether?

Help-desk issue

1. Looking the promoter to express AVB of C. Elegans (github #7667) https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/7667