Difference between revisions of "WBConfCall 2020.04.02-Agenda and Minutes"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
 
* Where can i find the upstream and downstream limits for a gene? [https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/7651 #7651] and [https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/7652 #7652]. College assignment
 
* Where can i find the upstream and downstream limits for a gene? [https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/7651 #7651] and [https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/7652 #7652]. College assignment
 
* [https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/7579 Maureen Barr's question about protein coding genes with known function]; can this be closed?
 
* [https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/7579 Maureen Barr's question about protein coding genes with known function]; can this be closed?
 +
** I responded to Maureen with some of the ideas/thoughts we had when we discussed this on a previous call.  I haven't heard back from her, but thought it might be a good idea to keep the ticket open as it raised an interesting issue that might be worthwhile future work for WB.  Okay to close, though, if people would prefer that.

Revision as of 15:28, 2 April 2020

Agenda and Minutes

Adding strain genotype information

  • Having strains with only an ID is not useful, without the genotype
  • Easy to add the genotype information when a curator is reading the paper, and to do it at the same time as request for the ID
  • Not efficient to have to e-mail and then wait for this to be added

Evidence and Conclusion Ontology in WB

  • In preparation for the new GO file formats, GPAD/GPI 2.0, we'll need to incorporate the Evidence and Conclusion Ontology (ECO) into WB
  • Working on a model for ECO in WB
  • This would replace ?GO_code in the ?GO_annotation model
  • Other models use ?GO_code - do we want to switch them to ?ECO_code at some point as well?

GitHub Tickets

  • Where can i find the upstream and downstream limits for a gene? #7651 and #7652. College assignment
  • Maureen Barr's question about protein coding genes with known function; can this be closed?
    • I responded to Maureen with some of the ideas/thoughts we had when we discussed this on a previous call. I haven't heard back from her, but thought it might be a good idea to keep the ticket open as it raised an interesting issue that might be worthwhile future work for WB. Okay to close, though, if people would prefer that.