Difference between revisions of "WBConfCall 2020.04.02-Agenda and Minutes"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
* Other models use ?GO_code - do we want to switch them to ?ECO_code at some point as well?
 
* Other models use ?GO_code - do we want to switch them to ?ECO_code at some point as well?
  
== GitHub Tickets ==
+
=== GitHub Tickets ===
  
* where can i find the upstream and downstream limits for a gene? #7651 and #7652. College assignment
+
* where can i find the upstream and downstream limits for a gene? [https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/7651 #7651] #7651 and [https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/7652 #7652] #7652. College assignment
 +
* [https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/7579 Maureen Barr's question about protein coding genes with known function]; can this be closed?

Revision as of 13:58, 2 April 2020

Agenda and Minutes

Adding strain genotype information

  • Having strains with only an ID is not useful, without the genotype
  • Easy to add the genotype information when a curator is reading the paper, and to do it at the same time as request for the ID
  • Not efficient to have to e-mail and then wait for this to be added

Evidence and Conclusion Ontology in WB

  • In preparation for the new GO file formats, GPAD/GPI 2.0, we'll need to incorporate the Evidence and Conclusion Ontology (ECO) into WB
  • Working on a model for ECO in WB
  • This would replace ?GO_code in the ?GO_annotation model
  • Other models use ?GO_code - do we want to switch them to ?ECO_code at some point as well?

GitHub Tickets