Difference between revisions of "WBConfCall 2020.02.20-Agenda and Minutes"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (Vanaukenk moved page WBConfCall 2020.02.20 to WBConfCall 2020.02.20-Agenda and Minutes: wrong page name) |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
** What criteria would give us a reasonable estimate of that number? | ** What criteria would give us a reasonable estimate of that number? | ||
*** No phenotype, interaction, GO, expression? Anything else? | *** No phenotype, interaction, GO, expression? Anything else? | ||
+ | *** Answering this kind of question requires us to have "complete" curation on certain data types. Are we going to keep this goal with the move into AGR? If "complete" on all data types is not a practical goal, which data types should be targeted to "complete"? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * [https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/7581 I was directed here from a link on the CGC] | ||
+ | ** Do we need to take any action to fix the broken Strain links from CGC to WormBase? (notify CGC or point the old URLs to the current strain URLs ...) |
Revision as of 20:33, 19 February 2020
Agenda
Project Meeting
- Plan is to have Caltech host
- Doodle poll for April and May dates
- How many days do we need?
Help Desk
- Estimate of number of C. elegans genes with no function
- What criteria would give us a reasonable estimate of that number?
- No phenotype, interaction, GO, expression? Anything else?
- Answering this kind of question requires us to have "complete" curation on certain data types. Are we going to keep this goal with the move into AGR? If "complete" on all data types is not a practical goal, which data types should be targeted to "complete"?
- What criteria would give us a reasonable estimate of that number?
- I was directed here from a link on the CGC
- Do we need to take any action to fix the broken Strain links from CGC to WormBase? (notify CGC or point the old URLs to the current strain URLs ...)