Difference between revisions of "WBConfCall 2018.05.17-Agenda and Minutes"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
| − | *On call: Adam, Cecilia, Chris, Daniela, Juancarlos, Karen, Kimberly | + | *On call: Adam, Cecilia, Chris, Daniela, Juancarlos, Karen, Kimberly, Raymond, Scott, Sibyl, Todd, Valerio, Wen, Kevin, Paul D, Gary, Matt, Paul K |
| + | |||
| + | ===HelpDesk - Kimberly=== | ||
| + | '''Helpdesk Issues Still Open''' | ||
| + | *[https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/6417 I am trying to have access to fosmid ...] | ||
| + | **On staging, we will begin providing the end sequences | ||
| + | **We've never had the full sequence, so if we were providing a "fosmid" sequence, it might have been the intervening genomic sequence | ||
| + | **What would users want? | ||
| + | **It seems we could provide the intervening sequence but we need to communicate with users about what they're actually getting, i.e. a prediction. | ||
| + | **Would this be a potential source of confusion to users, though, who may need to validate the sequence against a clone they order from Don Moerman's group? | ||
| + | **Resolution: for next release, provide intervening genomic sequence but make it clear that it's predicted from genomic. | ||
| + | **Chris will check and close the original ticket, if the changes Adam pushed are okay. | ||
Revision as of 15:39, 17 May 2018
Contents
Agenda
HelpDesk - Kimberly
Helpdesk Issues Still Open
WBStrain ids
- would be good to get a list of people who need to be able to create new strains
- will reside temporary in the old NameServer at Sanger and then move to the new Datomic one on AWS
SAB - Toronto, CA
AGR
Minutes
- On call: Adam, Cecilia, Chris, Daniela, Juancarlos, Karen, Kimberly, Raymond, Scott, Sibyl, Todd, Valerio, Wen, Kevin, Paul D, Gary, Matt, Paul K
HelpDesk - Kimberly
Helpdesk Issues Still Open
- I am trying to have access to fosmid ...
- On staging, we will begin providing the end sequences
- We've never had the full sequence, so if we were providing a "fosmid" sequence, it might have been the intervening genomic sequence
- What would users want?
- It seems we could provide the intervening sequence but we need to communicate with users about what they're actually getting, i.e. a prediction.
- Would this be a potential source of confusion to users, though, who may need to validate the sequence against a clone they order from Don Moerman's group?
- Resolution: for next release, provide intervening genomic sequence but make it clear that it's predicted from genomic.
- Chris will check and close the original ticket, if the changes Adam pushed are okay.
