Difference between revisions of "WBConfCall 2015.09.03-Agenda and Minutes"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with "= Agenda = == 1 == == 2 == =Minutes= == 1 == == 2 ==") |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
=Minutes= | =Minutes= | ||
− | == | + | == Datomic Progress == |
+ | Paul: | ||
+ | Gary: porting, perl scripts for querying datomic | ||
+ | Juancarlos: finished working through documentation | ||
+ | Adam: | ||
+ | * Method for provisioning machines with Datomic, website, etc. | ||
+ | * Using Docker to be able to quickly deploy going forward. | ||
+ | * Makes future development much easier, good error reporting | ||
− | == | + | Genetomic / curation database |
+ | * close to be ready to production, but not quite ready | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | WormMethods chapters | ||
+ | PWS: getting some reviews back | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Models === | ||
+ | * PD: Deadline for proposals is next week | ||
+ | |||
+ | PATO | ||
+ | * RL: Do we need to extend the model to accommodate the ontology? Is there a name class? | ||
+ | * CG: Cost for creating a new class? | ||
+ | * TD: already bringing in .obo files from other ontologies | ||
+ | * Discussion about whether or not we will show the data on the website | ||
+ | * CG: will create a new class for PATO | ||
+ | * -- discussion about who handles obo->ace files: individual curators. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * DR: Hold off on changes for micropublication (?Expression_patt) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ------> DISCONNECTED <------ sorry | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Expression_cluster | ||
+ | Human_disease (Xiaodong) | ||
+ | GO_term (addition to ?Paper) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Raymond: should we go through a two tier process for models? | ||
+ | * 1. Review process | ||
+ | * 2. Put it into the models file | ||
+ | |||
+ | PD: discussion typically occurs before the proposal hits the model list? | ||
+ | RL: Caltech is dispersed and the expertise is deluded. | ||
+ | |||
+ | WC: How do model changes work for Datomic? | ||
+ | |||
+ | PD: | ||
+ | |||
+ | TH: So do we want to formalize/enhance the model proposal process? | ||
+ | |||
+ | PD: Will come up with a working document. | ||
+ | |||
+ | -- | ||
+ | |||
+ | Intermine: | ||
+ | SG: Webapp is running and still a few small issues | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | GBrowse/JBrowse | ||
+ | * SC: | ||
+ | |||
+ | WS250 | ||
+ | * Promoting JBrowse |
Revision as of 17:53, 3 September 2015
Agenda
1
2
Minutes
Datomic Progress
Paul: Gary: porting, perl scripts for querying datomic Juancarlos: finished working through documentation Adam:
- Method for provisioning machines with Datomic, website, etc.
- Using Docker to be able to quickly deploy going forward.
- Makes future development much easier, good error reporting
Genetomic / curation database
- close to be ready to production, but not quite ready
WormMethods chapters
PWS: getting some reviews back
Models
- PD: Deadline for proposals is next week
PATO
- RL: Do we need to extend the model to accommodate the ontology? Is there a name class?
- CG: Cost for creating a new class?
- TD: already bringing in .obo files from other ontologies
- Discussion about whether or not we will show the data on the website
- CG: will create a new class for PATO
- -- discussion about who handles obo->ace files: individual curators.
- DR: Hold off on changes for micropublication (?Expression_patt)
> DISCONNECTED <------ sorry
Expression_cluster
Human_disease (Xiaodong)
GO_term (addition to ?Paper)
Raymond: should we go through a two tier process for models?
- 1. Review process
- 2. Put it into the models file
PD: discussion typically occurs before the proposal hits the model list? RL: Caltech is dispersed and the expertise is deluded.
WC: How do model changes work for Datomic?
PD:
TH: So do we want to formalize/enhance the model proposal process?
PD: Will come up with a working document.
--
Intermine: SG: Webapp is running and still a few small issues
GBrowse/JBrowse
- SC:
WS250
- Promoting JBrowse