Difference between revisions of "WBConfCall 2015.07.02-Agenda and Minutes"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "= Agenda = = Minutes =")
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
= Agenda =
 
= Agenda =
 +
please submit your agenda items here
 +
 +
== WS250 schedule ==
 +
* reminder of timings
 +
** 10th July upload
 +
** 14th of August on FTP
 +
** 1st of October on live website
 +
 +
== Feedback from IWM ==
 +
 +
== Helpdesk ==
 +
 +
* Should we track "date last reviewed"? ([https://github.com/WormBase/website/issues/3997 3887])
  
 
= Minutes =
 
= Minutes =
 +
== WS250 schedule ==
 +
bumped to the end of the month:
 +
 +
* reminder of timings
 +
** 31st July upload
 +
** 31st of August on FTP
 +
** 1st of November on live website
 +
 +
== Phenotype/ontology display ==
 +
 +
* Alphabetical lists not necessarily most helpful, take advantage of the ontology
 +
* Todd: sometimes more specific terms are most useful, don't necessarily want to group towards most general terms.
 +
* Some widgets overloaded with information.  Make overview more helpful.
 +
* Should be easy to see if, e.g., a gene has a null allele.
 +
 +
== Community contributions, "wiki-style editing" ==
 +
 +
* Focus on constrained forms instead.
 +
* Keep a clear distinction between data submissions and comments.
 +
* There is already a comment system.  Could be promoted better.
 +
* Is there a notification system when someone leaves a comment?
 +
* MA is writing a Gazette article about community curation.  Will mention the comment system.
 +
 +
== Date last reviewed ==
 +
 +
* There is interest in capturing this data.
 +
** High priority targets are gene structures and concise descriptions.
 +
* Also questions at the meeting about how to see when a gene structure last changed.  New isoforms, etc., are NOT currently captured in the history widget.
 +
* OMIM has a "last reviewed on" field at the bottom of each page.
 +
* Should we be curating complete gene pages?

Latest revision as of 08:42, 3 July 2015

Agenda

please submit your agenda items here

WS250 schedule

  • reminder of timings
    • 10th July upload
    • 14th of August on FTP
    • 1st of October on live website

Feedback from IWM

Helpdesk

  • Should we track "date last reviewed"? (3887)

Minutes

WS250 schedule

bumped to the end of the month:

  • reminder of timings
    • 31st July upload
    • 31st of August on FTP
    • 1st of November on live website

Phenotype/ontology display

  • Alphabetical lists not necessarily most helpful, take advantage of the ontology
  • Todd: sometimes more specific terms are most useful, don't necessarily want to group towards most general terms.
  • Some widgets overloaded with information. Make overview more helpful.
  • Should be easy to see if, e.g., a gene has a null allele.

Community contributions, "wiki-style editing"

  • Focus on constrained forms instead.
  • Keep a clear distinction between data submissions and comments.
  • There is already a comment system. Could be promoted better.
  • Is there a notification system when someone leaves a comment?
  • MA is writing a Gazette article about community curation. Will mention the comment system.

Date last reviewed

  • There is interest in capturing this data.
    • High priority targets are gene structures and concise descriptions.
  • Also questions at the meeting about how to see when a gene structure last changed. New isoforms, etc., are NOT currently captured in the history widget.
  • OMIM has a "last reviewed on" field at the bottom of each page.
  • Should we be curating complete gene pages?