From WormBaseWikiJump to navigationJump to search
seqchange is highlighted in yellow, which means that the SVM performance is good judging by using those papers fristpassed. I need to obtain a list of curated paper IDs to validate the results.
|Data Type||ID_Num_0709||Methdos||Ids of curated paper||Flag email (from first pass form)|
|seqchange||1000||SVM||need||genenames at wormbase dot org|
Among the above, we have run SVM on seqchange using the papers have already firstpassed/flagged as training/testing set and the performance is looking pretty good (recall/precision > 0.9). The next step is to see whether we have enough number of curated seqchage papers to use as training set (normally >400 papers), and if there is no enough curated papers, we'll need to check how clean these flagged seachange papers are, i.e., the datacurator for seqchange would have to check ~ 20 randomly selected papers among them. The datatype curator for seqchange may also want to validate the SVM resutls for a few runs on the new coming IDs so to provide quick feedback and we could see how we could improve the performance.
Back to Caltech documentation