Difference between revisions of "Topic (WBProcess) Model build"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 40: Line 40:
==Current wspec model file==
==Current wspec model file==
''This will have all the other model corrections in place''
''This will have all the other model corrections in place''

Revision as of 19:50, 11 August 2010

Links to other relevant pages:
Caltech documentation
Overview of process pages

Process page and model concerns
Molecule model build

Project Model

Proposed structure for the WB biological processes model

last updated 26 Feb, 2010

////////////////////////////////// ?WBProcess Model ///////////////////////////////////////////////
?WBProcess       Name      ?Text
                            Process_term ?Text
                            Other_name ?Text
                            Summary           ?Text #Evidence
                            Related_process ?WBProcess XREF Related_process
                            Involved_entity      Gene ?Gene XREF WBProcess     #Evidence  
                                                             Anatomy_term ?Anatomy_term XREF WBProcess #Evidence
                                                             Expression_cluster ?Expression_cluster XREF WBProcess #Evidence
                            Associated_with         Phenotype ?Phenotype XREF WBProcess
                                                                 GO_term ?GO_term XREF WBProcess
                            Remark ?Text #Evidence 
                            Paper ?Paper XREF WBProcess  #Evidence

Definition and use of classes and tags

  • Name -> An ID space for the process (e.g., WBbiopr:0000001) <We can get rid of a few of the zeros>
  • Summary -> A definition of the process with reference evidence (will it be enough to have the reference listed here, or do we also need a separate reference in the model?)
  • Process_term -> Public name
  • Other_name -> Synonyms
  • Related_process -> Relationships between different WB defined biological processes
  • Involved_entity-> XREF to objects in other classes that will be annotated with a process term. Process annotations for genes and papers that have not yet been attached to genes and papers through any other tag or annotation. Direct gene and paper annotations can be filtered out during .ace file dumps for those cases where the gene and paper have been connected to the process through other tags, i.e. GO mappings, phenotype mappings, microarray, anatomy.
  • Associated_with -> Mappings to terms in GO and Phenotype classes
  • Remark -> A remark field to capture things that don't quite fit anywhere else yet. Also to be used to make comments about papers that should be connected to the process, if it has not been through other means, possibly review papers? Could also make a separate paper XREF.
  • Reference -> Associated papers. The evidence hash for this tag is for remarks to record why the paper is associated with the process, this is especially useful for those papers that are associated with the process directly rather than through any of the other tags. Ideally I would like the papers sorted by type for display on the website, that is it would be good to have papers that are reviews separate from papers that are primary research.

test .ace data

Current wspec model file

This will have all the other model corrections in place