Difference between revisions of "Sequence Feature"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with '== Rules for marking up regions== If a region is necessary and sufficient to drive a reporter gene, then mark it as an 'enhancer' or 'silencer'. If a region is both an enhancer…')
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Rules for marking up regions==
 
== Rules for marking up regions==
  
If a region is necessary and sufficient to drive a reporter gene, then
+
*If a region is necessary and sufficient to drive a reporter gene, then
 
mark it as an 'enhancer' or 'silencer'.
 
mark it as an 'enhancer' or 'silencer'.
  
If a region is both an enhancer and a silencer, then it should have
+
*If a region is both an enhancer and a silencer, then it should have
 
the SO_term tags for both of these.
 
the SO_term tags for both of these.
  
If mobility shift experiments or similar experimental evidence is
+
*If mobility shift experiments or similar experimental evidence is
 
available to assert that a short region is a TF binding site, then
 
available to assert that a short region is a TF binding site, then
 
mark it as a TF_binding_site.
 
mark it as a TF_binding_site.
  
Similarity to a known binding motif is not evidence of being a
+
*Similarity to a known binding motif is not evidence of being a
 
TF_binding_site.
 
TF_binding_site.
  
If there is no evidence for a TF binding site and it has an effect on
+
*If there is no evidence for a TF binding site and it has an effect on
 
expression when mutated or deleted, but is not sufficient to drive a
 
expression when mutated or deleted, but is not sufficient to drive a
 
reporter gene, then we cannot assert that it is an enhancer or a TF
 
reporter gene, then we cannot assert that it is an enhancer or a TF
 
binding site. Mark it as an anonymous 'regulatory_region'.
 
binding site. Mark it as an anonymous 'regulatory_region'.
  
If a region has the properties of being both a TF binding site and an
+
*If a region has the properties of being both a TF binding site and an
 
enhancer then mark it up as two Features, one a TF_binding_site and
 
enhancer then mark it up as two Features, one a TF_binding_site and
 
one an enhancer.
 
one an enhancer.
  
If a region is asserted to be a promoter region in the paper and it is
+
*If a region is asserted to be a promoter region in the paper and it is
 
within 200bp (or thereabouts?) of the 5' of the target gene and it is neccessary and
 
within 200bp (or thereabouts?) of the 5' of the target gene and it is neccessary and
 
sufficient to promote a reporter gene, mark it as a promoter. If in
 
sufficient to promote a reporter gene, mark it as a promoter. If in
 
doubt, consider marking it as an enhancer.
 
doubt, consider marking it as an enhancer.

Revision as of 08:39, 30 July 2013

Rules for marking up regions

  • If a region is necessary and sufficient to drive a reporter gene, then

mark it as an 'enhancer' or 'silencer'.

  • If a region is both an enhancer and a silencer, then it should have

the SO_term tags for both of these.

  • If mobility shift experiments or similar experimental evidence is

available to assert that a short region is a TF binding site, then mark it as a TF_binding_site.

  • Similarity to a known binding motif is not evidence of being a

TF_binding_site.

  • If there is no evidence for a TF binding site and it has an effect on

expression when mutated or deleted, but is not sufficient to drive a reporter gene, then we cannot assert that it is an enhancer or a TF binding site. Mark it as an anonymous 'regulatory_region'.

  • If a region has the properties of being both a TF binding site and an

enhancer then mark it up as two Features, one a TF_binding_site and one an enhancer.

  • If a region is asserted to be a promoter region in the paper and it is

within 200bp (or thereabouts?) of the 5' of the target gene and it is neccessary and sufficient to promote a reporter gene, mark it as a promoter. If in doubt, consider marking it as an enhancer.