Difference between revisions of "Erratum in and Erratum for"
(New page: There are 3 papers that currently use the Erratum tag. Here's how we'll populate the data in the new model: WBPaper00004137 has a published erratum, WBPaper00004301 WBPaper00004137 Err...) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Here's how we'll populate the data in the new model: | Here's how we'll populate the data in the new model: | ||
− | WBPaper00004137 has | + | WBPaper00004137 has one published erratum, WBPaper00004301 |
WBPaper00004137 | WBPaper00004137 | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
WBPaper00004301 | WBPaper00004301 | ||
+ | |||
Erratum_for WBPaper00004137 | Erratum_for WBPaper00004137 | ||
Type Published_erratum | Type Published_erratum | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ALSO, | + | '''ALSO''', these two papers were merged and they shouldn't have been. We need to unmerge them. |
+ | In general, original papers and erratum should NOT be merged; they are two separate publications. | ||
+ | '''ALSO''', WBPaper00004301 has Interaction objects associated with it; these should be removed | ||
+ | since the objects are associated with the original paper, WBPaper00004137. I don't know who | ||
+ | is now handling the interaction data, Xiaodong? Perhaps she can correct this in the .ace file. | ||
− | + | ---- | |
+ | |||
+ | WBPaper00003297 has three published errata: WBPaper00003344, WBPaper00003456, WBPaper00026886 | ||
+ | |||
+ | WBPaper00003297 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Erratum_in WBPaper00003344 | ||
+ | Erratum_in WBPaper00003456 | ||
+ | Erratum_in WBPaper00026886 | ||
+ | Type Journal_article | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | WBPaper00003344 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Erratum_for WBPaper00003297 | ||
+ | Type Published_erratum | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | WBPaper00003456 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Erratum_for WBPaper00003297 | ||
+ | Type Published_erratum | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | WBPaper00026886 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Erratum_for WBPaper00003297 | ||
+ | Type Published_erratum |
Revision as of 13:02, 12 November 2009
There are 3 papers that currently use the Erratum tag.
Here's how we'll populate the data in the new model:
WBPaper00004137 has one published erratum, WBPaper00004301
WBPaper00004137
Erratum_in WBPaper00004301 Type Journal_article
WBPaper00004301
Erratum_for WBPaper00004137 Type Published_erratum
ALSO, these two papers were merged and they shouldn't have been. We need to unmerge them.
In general, original papers and erratum should NOT be merged; they are two separate publications.
ALSO, WBPaper00004301 has Interaction objects associated with it; these should be removed since the objects are associated with the original paper, WBPaper00004137. I don't know who is now handling the interaction data, Xiaodong? Perhaps she can correct this in the .ace file.
WBPaper00003297 has three published errata: WBPaper00003344, WBPaper00003456, WBPaper00026886
WBPaper00003297
Erratum_in WBPaper00003344 Erratum_in WBPaper00003456 Erratum_in WBPaper00026886 Type Journal_article
WBPaper00003344
Erratum_for WBPaper00003297 Type Published_erratum
WBPaper00003456
Erratum_for WBPaper00003297 Type Published_erratum
WBPaper00026886
Erratum_for WBPaper00003297 Type Published_erratum