Difference between revisions of "Erratum in and Erratum for"

From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: There are 3 papers that currently use the Erratum tag. Here's how we'll populate the data in the new model: WBPaper00004137 has a published erratum, WBPaper00004301 WBPaper00004137 Err...)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Here's how we'll populate the data in the new model:
 
Here's how we'll populate the data in the new model:
  
WBPaper00004137 has a published erratum, WBPaper00004301
+
WBPaper00004137 has one published erratum, WBPaper00004301
  
 
WBPaper00004137
 
WBPaper00004137
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
WBPaper00004301
 
WBPaper00004301
 +
 
Erratum_for WBPaper00004137
 
Erratum_for WBPaper00004137
 
Type Published_erratum
 
Type Published_erratum
  
ALSO, these two papers were merged and they shouldn't have been.
 
We need to unmerge them.
 
  
ALSO, WBPaper00004301 has Interaction objects associated with it; these should be removed.
+
'''ALSO''', these two papers were merged and they shouldn't have been.  We need to unmerge them.
 +
In general, original papers and erratum should NOT be merged; they are two separate publications.
  
 +
'''ALSO''', WBPaper00004301 has Interaction objects associated with it; these should be removed
 +
since the objects are associated with the original paper, WBPaper00004137.  I don't know who
 +
is now handling the interaction data, Xiaodong?  Perhaps she can correct this in the .ace file.
  
  
WBPaper00003456 has published erratum,
+
----
 +
 
 +
WBPaper00003297 has three published errata: WBPaper00003344, WBPaper00003456, WBPaper00026886
 +
 
 +
WBPaper00003297
 +
 
 +
Erratum_in WBPaper00003344
 +
Erratum_in WBPaper00003456
 +
Erratum_in WBPaper00026886
 +
Type Journal_article
 +
 
 +
 
 +
WBPaper00003344
 +
 
 +
Erratum_for WBPaper00003297
 +
Type Published_erratum
 +
 
 +
 
 +
WBPaper00003456
 +
 
 +
Erratum_for WBPaper00003297
 +
Type Published_erratum
 +
 
 +
 
 +
WBPaper00026886
 +
 
 +
Erratum_for WBPaper00003297
 +
Type Published_erratum

Revision as of 13:02, 12 November 2009

There are 3 papers that currently use the Erratum tag.

Here's how we'll populate the data in the new model:

WBPaper00004137 has one published erratum, WBPaper00004301

WBPaper00004137

Erratum_in WBPaper00004301 Type Journal_article


WBPaper00004301

Erratum_for WBPaper00004137 Type Published_erratum


ALSO, these two papers were merged and they shouldn't have been. We need to unmerge them. In general, original papers and erratum should NOT be merged; they are two separate publications.

ALSO, WBPaper00004301 has Interaction objects associated with it; these should be removed since the objects are associated with the original paper, WBPaper00004137. I don't know who is now handling the interaction data, Xiaodong? Perhaps she can correct this in the .ace file.



WBPaper00003297 has three published errata: WBPaper00003344, WBPaper00003456, WBPaper00026886

WBPaper00003297

Erratum_in WBPaper00003344 Erratum_in WBPaper00003456 Erratum_in WBPaper00026886 Type Journal_article


WBPaper00003344

Erratum_for WBPaper00003297 Type Published_erratum


WBPaper00003456

Erratum_for WBPaper00003297 Type Published_erratum


WBPaper00026886

Erratum_for WBPaper00003297 Type Published_erratum