Difference between revisions of "Erratum in and Erratum for"
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
'''ALSO''', we need to make sure we have PDFs of all the erratum. | '''ALSO''', we need to make sure we have PDFs of all the erratum. | ||
| − | '''ALSO''', the new version of the paper editor will need to | + | '''ALSO''', the new version of the paper editor will need to have at least three lines for Erratum_in |
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
WBPaper00026959 has one published erratum, WBPaper00027096 | WBPaper00026959 has one published erratum, WBPaper00027096 | ||
| + | |||
WBPaper00026959 | WBPaper00026959 | ||
| Line 80: | Line 81: | ||
Type Journal_article | Type Journal_article | ||
| + | |||
WBPaper00027096 | WBPaper00027096 | ||
| Line 86: | Line 88: | ||
Type Published_erratum | Type Published_erratum | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 13:19, 12 November 2009
There are 3 papers that currently use the Erratum tag.
Here's how we'll populate the data in the new model:
WBPaper00004137 has one published erratum, WBPaper00004301
WBPaper00004137
Erratum_in WBPaper00004301
Type Journal_article
WBPaper00004301
Erratum_for WBPaper00004137
Type Published_erratum
ALSO, these two papers were merged and they shouldn't have been. We need to unmerge them.
In general, original papers and erratum should NOT be merged; they are two separate publications.
ALSO, WBPaper00004301 has Interaction objects associated with it; these should be removed since the objects are associated with the original paper, WBPaper00004137. I don't know who is now handling the interaction data, Xiaodong? Perhaps she can correct this in the .ace file.
WBPaper00003297 has three published errata: WBPaper00003344, WBPaper00003456, WBPaper00026886
WBPaper00003297
Erratum_in WBPaper00003344
Erratum_in WBPaper00003456
Erratum_in WBPaper00026886
Type Journal_article
WBPaper00003344
Erratum_for WBPaper00003297
Type Published_erratum
WBPaper00003456
Erratum_for WBPaper00003297
Type Published_erratum
WBPaper00026886
Erratum_for WBPaper00003297
Type Published_erratum
ALSO, we need to make sure we have PDFs of all the erratum.
ALSO, the new version of the paper editor will need to have at least three lines for Erratum_in
WBPaper00026959 has one published erratum, WBPaper00027096
WBPaper00026959
Erratum_in WBPaper00027096
Type Journal_article
WBPaper00027096
Erratum_for WBPaper00026959
Type Published_erratum
