Difference between revisions of "Calls"
From WormBaseWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (→Agenda) |
(→Agenda) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
the first one falls into the micropublication scope, the second is more like a Worm Breeder's Gazette article. | the first one falls into the micropublication scope, the second is more like a Worm Breeder's Gazette article. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2)Workflow | ||
| + | |||
| + | * from Submission through the form till acceptance by a reviewer we need to track the submission and store metadata in a proper way. Are we going to: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - outsource to e-journal press or similar? | ||
| + | |||
| + | - develop in house? Need developer time, Who is going to do it | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3) Editorial Board | ||
| + | |||
| + | *if we start a journal we need an EIC (Paul?) and an editorial board.Who will select and contact the potential editorial board, when. | ||
Revision as of 16:30, 27 September 2016
September 27 2016
Agenda
1)Type of submissions
- For gene expression micropublications: the submission includes
- reagents used to perform the experiment (transgene, construct, antibody, etc..)
- the read out of the experiment, i.e. image with pattern description and curated metadata
- for phenotype micropublications, Nemametrix has 2 kind of tech notes:
- http://nemametrix.com/trehalose-extends-healthspan-c-elegans/
- http://nemametrix.com/microfluidic-epg-recordings-diverse-nematode-species/
the first one falls into the micropublication scope, the second is more like a Worm Breeder's Gazette article.
2)Workflow
- from Submission through the form till acceptance by a reviewer we need to track the submission and store metadata in a proper way. Are we going to:
- outsource to e-journal press or similar?
- develop in house? Need developer time, Who is going to do it
3) Editorial Board
- if we start a journal we need an EIC (Paul?) and an editorial board.Who will select and contact the potential editorial board, when.
